• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contr to the deaths of 2 Police officers? [W:68, W:433]

Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?


  • Total voters
    67
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers? [W

They're using red text. Which ideology uses red to show political leaning...

View attachment 67177739
Yep. The march calling for dead cops must have been led by conservatives.

5xm3h.png
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Kobie, these are middle aged folks believing that a hashtag is a political organization with many chapters in different cities. If that doesn't sound off any alarms as to how little these people know about what is going on, nothing should. I literally just explained to vesper what #blacklivesmatter was and she just went on to say that it was going to be sued. Lmao, how the hell do you bring a lawsuit against a hashtag? How do you sue a group of people who organize under a hashtag without incorporating? It's absolutely astounding the kind of **** that is flying around right now.

Oh really, maybe you should send off an E-mail to CBS news and inform them that Black Lives Matters is just a hash tag and not a group.

"The mall went into a partial shutdown for about two hours as thousands of protesters filled the rotunda on one of the busiest shopping days of the year. The group, “Black Lives Matter” chose the mall for its high visibility, but was warned repeatedly that it was private property."
Charges Expected To Be Filed Against MOA Protest Organizers « CBS Minnesota
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Oh really

Yes, really. Do you actually know what a hashtag is? Here, let's do a little experiment, I welcome you to find a single state where "an organization" has been incorporated under the name "Black Lives Matter". Just one. When you do that, you get back to me and tell us all about how they're going to be sued. Let's start with Minnesota shall we?

Form 990, 990 Tax Forms | Foundation Center

View attachment 67177746

Nope! No Black Lives Matter incorporated in Minnesota. Okay, fine what about... the entire US?

View attachment 67177745

Nope. Nothing there either. Well, alright, maybe they're not incorporated a non-profit... Okay so what are they?

Black Lives Matter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Black Lives Matter is a primarily American movement and hashtag (#BlackLivesMatter) that started after the acquittal of the killer of Trayvon Martin and received fresh impetus from the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown. In December 2014, at least 20 members of the movement were arrested during protests at the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota.[1]

Oh! Wait! They're a movement and a hashtag! So essentially trying to sue them is like saying you're going to sue Flower Power. Do you realize just how ridiculous you sound when you don't know the first thing about the "organization" that you believe can be sued?
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Oh really, maybe you should send off an E-mail to CBS news and inform them that Black Lives Matters is just a hash tag and not a group.

"The mall went into a partial shutdown for about two hours as thousands of protesters filled the rotunda on one of the busiest shopping days of the year. The group, “Black Lives Matter” chose the mall for its high visibility, but was warned repeatedly that it was private property."
Charges Expected To Be Filed Against MOA Protest Organizers « CBS Minnesota

They were warned, and after several warnings protested anyway-and now face legal sanctions. Its a lot of libs, sprinkled with dirty old radicals, in other words a dirty old town (midwestern style). And btw I partially grew up there in that town.

Liberals can't handle reality, even with youtube. They think they know but they dont.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Yes, really. Do you actually know what a hashtag is? Here, let's do a little experiment, I welcome you to find a single state where "an organization" has been incorporated under the name "Black Lives Matter". Just one. When you do that, you get back to me and tell us all about how they're going to be sued. Let's start with Minnesota shall we?

Form 990, 990 Tax Forms | Foundation Center

View attachment 67177746

Nope! No Black Lives Matter incorporated in Minnesota. Okay, fine what about... the entire US?

View attachment 67177745

Nope. Nothing there either. Well, alright, maybe they're not incorporated a non-profit... Okay so what are they?

Black Lives Matter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Oh! Wait! They're a movement and a hashtag! So essentially trying to sue them is like saying you're going to sue Flower Power. Do you realize just how ridiculous you sound when you don't know the first thing about the "organization" that you believe can be sued?

:lamo One day you will be smacked by reality and see what you see online differs from reality. Save it, agist.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers? [W

Let's keep going shall we?


View attachment 67177748

Nope, nothing there. Maybe they're a 501(c)(3)?

501c3 Lookup & Search Tool: Fast, Sortable, Nonprofit 501c List

View attachment 67177749

Nope. Nothing there either. Okay, okay, what.... about... a 501(c)(4) with that name?

Search Results

View attachment 67177750

Ding ding! We have... 2 hits! ... Wait... neither of these is what we're looking for... what if we explain that we want an organization with that nameand not any results with the words used:

View attachment 67177751

Nope... nada. Vesper, I know you're like 70. However, I really wish sometimes you'd listen to young folks when it comes to this stuff. This isn't "a group". These are a bunch of people operating under a single hashtag and coordinating through the use of it. There is no Black Lives Matter incorporated anywhere in the US. There is no organization with different chapters linking up with Sharpton. Literally anyone can start a rally under the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter, and people will understand what the reason for the rally/protest/cookout/whatever is about. A local black church can organize under #BlackLivesMatter. A restaurant can hold a fundraiser under #BlackLivesMatter. You look really nutty when you try and claim that they're a group anymore than Flower Power was an organization or The Beatnicks were an organization. This is a movement. You don't have to agree with the reasons behind it, but to state it is an organization is absolutely ignorant of what it actually is.
 
Last edited:
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Yes, really. Do you actually know what a hashtag is? Here, let's do a little experiment, I welcome you to find a single state where "an organization" has been incorporated under the name "Black Lives Matter". Just one. When you do that, you get back to me and tell us all about how they're going to be sued. Let's start with Minnesota shall we?

Form 990, 990 Tax Forms | Foundation Center

View attachment 67177746

Nope! No Black Lives Matter incorporated in Minnesota. Okay, fine what about... the entire US?

View attachment 67177745

Nope. Nothing there either. Well, alright, maybe they're not incorporated a non-profit... Okay so what are they?

Black Lives Matter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Oh! Wait! They're a movement and a hashtag! So essentially trying to sue them is like saying you're going to sue Flower Power. Do you realize just how ridiculous you sound when you don't know the first thing about the "organization" that you believe can be sued?


Which in your post you never addressed why CBS is calling "Black Lives Matter" a group
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

:lamo One day you will be smacked by reality and see what you see online differs from reality. Save it, agist.

Agist? I haven't treated her any different than I treat you when it's clear you have no clue what you're discussing. Now move along, before I decide to destroy any of your ridiculous arguments in this thread.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers? [W

Let's keep going shall we?


View attachment 67177748

Nope, nothing there. Maybe they're a 501(c)(3)?

501c3 Lookup & Search Tool: Fast, Sortable, Nonprofit 501c List

View attachment 67177749

Nope. Nothing there either. Okay, okay, what.... about... a 501(c)(4) with that name?

Search Results

View attachment 67177750

Ding ding! We have... 2 hits! ... Wait... neither of these is what we're looking for... what if we explain that we want an organization with that nameand not any results with the words used:

View attachment 67177751

Nope... nada. Vesper, I know you're like 70. However, I really wish sometimes you'd listen to young folks when it comes to this stuff. This isn't "a group". These are a bunch of people operating under a single hashtag and coordinating through the use of it. There is no Black Lives Matter incorporated anywhere in the US. There is no organization with different chapters linking up with Sharpton. Literally anyone can start a rally under the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter, and people will understand what the reason for the rally/protest/cookout/whatever is about. A local black church can organize under #BlackLivesMatter. A restaurant can hold a fundraiser under #BlackLivesMatter. You look really nutty when you try and claim that they're a group anymore than Flower Power was an organization or The Beatnicks were an organization. This is a movement. You don't have to agree with the reasons behind it, but to state it is an organization is absolutely ignorant of what it actually is.

This poor boy thinks he knows! He best eat his bbq!
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Which in your post you never addressed why CBS is calling "Black Lives Matter" a group

He thinks it does not exist if its not on his liberal website! Reality sneers Oh Rly?!?!?
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Agist? I haven't treated her any different than I treat you when it's clear you have no clue what you're discussing. Now move along, before I decide to destroy any of your ridiculous arguments in this thread.

You are gonna be mugged by reality. I hope insight is substantive. But in any case, it will be there.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Which in your post you never addressed why CBS is calling "Black Lives Matter" a group

You're right, I addressed why you were wrong in calling them an organization. Which I've already demonstrated that they are not. Now, as to why CBS is calling them "a group", how should I know why they're as uninformed as you are on this issue? It wouldn't be the first time a news organization gets it wrong when it comes to describing something they're not actually involved in. My guess is that it's for the same reason they call Anonymous "a group". It takes the work out of having to actually find a word that defines the hundreds upon hundreds of splinter cells acting under a single cause.

Again, your posts which have been corrected more than once, implied that this was an organization that was going to get sued. As I've already shown you: That is simply not possible because there is nothing they will be able to sue. There is no incorporated organization under such a name. There are community organizers organizing events using that hashtag. That's the best they have. They may be able to personally sue these event organizers, but when they try to draw up a legal document to sue "Black Lives Matter", they'll come to the realization that this isn't ACORN, this isn't MoveOn. This is more like OWS or The Tea Party. It's not an actual legal entity that can be sued.
 
Last edited:
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

You are gonna be mugged by reality. I hope insight is substantive. But in any case, it will be there.

Ooh, I'm scared.
 
Last edited:
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

He thinks it does not exist if its not on his liberal website! Reality sneers Oh Rly?!?!?

My liberal website? Guidestar is a liberal website? Lol. Somebody's angry that they get destroyed by me in every debate. If you've got nothing to contribute, you may as well move along US Con. :)
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

You're right, I addressed why you were wrong in calling them an organization. Which I've already demonstrated that they are not. Now, as to why CBS is calling them "a group", how should I know why they're as uninformed as you are on this issue? It wouldn't be the first time a news organization gets it wrong when it comes to describing something they're not actually involved in. My guess is that it's for the same reason they call Anonymous "a group". It takes the work out of having to actually find a word that defines the hundreds upon hundreds of splinter cells acting under a single cause.

Again, your posts which have been corrected more than once, implied that this was an organization that was going to get sued. As I've already shown you: That is simply not possible because there is nothing they will be able to sue. There is no incorporated organization under such a name. There are community organizers organizing events using that hashtag.

The organizers of Black Lives Matter rallies/marches are left activist groups working in sync to organize the rallies. The rally/march in DC was called a Black Lives Matter Rally promoted by Al Sharpton's group, NAN. The rally/march in NYC was organized by the same activist groups as a Black Lives Matter event. The protest at the Mall of America over the weekend was promoted as a Black Live Matters event. And to make it more confusing there is a group that identifies itself as Black Lives Matter.

Bottom line, Al Sharpton's NAN is working with the left activist groups organizing these rallies/marches. But when you have a group such as the Trayvon Martin Organizing Committee show up at NYC and start chanting "what do we want? Dead Cops" it becomes a problem for Al Sharpton.

The city of Milwaukee knows who the organizers of the Black Lives Matter event as the Mall personally told the group that it would not be tolerated prior to the event happening because the Mall was private property. They are suing the organizers.
 
Last edited:
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

The organizers of Black Lives Matter rallies/marches are left activist groups working in sync to organize the rallies.

Yes, nobody has argued otherwise. What has been in question is your erroneous understanding of just what Black Lives Matter is. Did you forget that already? That you took issue with the fact that I laughed at a lawsuit towards an entity that does not exist on paper?

The rally/march in DC was called a Black Lives Matter Rally promoted by Al Sharpton's group, NAN.

Damn it! You were starting off so well: Thousands join Al Sharpton in

Thousands join Al Sharpton in ‘Justice for All’ march in D.C.

The march Sharpton organized was called the JUSTICE FOR ALL. This has been explained to you by 3 other posters. How you can still get it so wrong is really insane.

The rally/march in NYC was organized by the same activist groups as a Black Lives Matter event.

Not it was not. Again, Zyphlin already addressed this nonsense. But I'll do it too just so you realize just how wrong you have it:

The Daily Fix: Families of Men Killed by Police to Join National March in Washington, D.C. | TakePart

Lead organizer Synead Nichols said in a statement, “We are a new generation of young multi*racial activists willing to take up the torch, and we’re not going to stand for this anymore.”

The person who organized the event in NYC is called Synead Nichols.

The protest at the Mall of America over the weekend was promoted as a Black Live Matters event.

Yes, this was an event promoted under the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter. You're starting to get it.

And to make it more confusing there is a group that identifies itself as Black Lives Matter.

There is nothing confusing about this. You really make it obvious time and time again that you don't really know what it is you're discussing.

Bottom line, Al Sharpton's NAN is working with the left activist groups organizing these rallies/marches.

Lmao, this has already been proven false above. Sharpton organized one rally, Sinead Nichols organized another. They were two independent rallies organized under the same hashtag in different cities and states. Again, do you realize why I laughed at the idea that Black Lives Matter was going to be sued? It's as if you really don't get that there is nothing that can be sued under the name of "Black Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is not an organization. It's a whole bunch of different community organizers protesting for the same reason and using the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter to bring attention to their own independent events. They're not working together, hell, the only thing that ties these people together is the cause they use to march and the social media they use.

But when you have a group such as the Trayvon Martin Organizing Committee show up at NYC and start chanting "what do we want? Dead Cops" it becomes a problem for Al Sharpton.

Your red herring is noted. However, there it has absolutely nothing to do with what we've been discussing for 2 pages now.
 
Last edited:
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers? [W

vesper said:
The city of Milwaukee knows who the organizers of the Black Lives Matter event as the Mall personally told the group that it would not be tolerated prior to the event happening because the Mall was private property. They are suing the organizers.


vesper said:
The good news today is Black Lives Matter is being sued for damages by the Mall of America in Milwaukee after they were told by the mall owner not to stage a protest on private property.
vesper said:
Maybe all the supporting groups of Black Lives Matter can help them cough up the money for damages.

Gee, it only took you about 3 pages to recognize your mistake. Doubt you'll admit how ridiculous you sounded when you kept saying they were going to sue Black Lives Matter. They're going to sue individuals. Guess why? Because Black Lives Matter is not a legal entity that can be sued. :lol:
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Yes, nobody has argued otherwise. What has been in question is your erroneous understanding of just what Black Lives Matter is. Did you forget that already? That you took issue with the fact that I laughed at a lawsuit towards an entity that does not exist on paper?



Damn it! You were starting off so well: Thousands join Al Sharpton in



The march Sharpton organized was called the JUSTICE FOR ALL. This has been explained to you by 3 other posters. How you can still get it so wrong is really insane.



Not it was not. Again, Zyphlin already addressed this nonsense. But I'll do it too just so you realize just how wrong you have it:

The Daily Fix: Families of Men Killed by Police to Join National March in Washington, D.C. | TakePart



The person who organized the event in NYC is called Synead Nichols.



Yes, this an event promoted under the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter. You're starting to gett it.



There is nothing confusing about this. You really make it obvious time and time again that you don't really know what it is you're discussing.



Lmao, this has already been proven false above. Sharpton organized one rally, Sinead Nichols organized another. They were two independent rallies organized under the same hashtag in different cities and states. Again, do you realize why I laughed at the idea that Black Lives Matter was going to be sued? It's as if you really don't get that there is nothing that can be sued under the name of "Black Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is not an organization. It's a whole bunch of different community organizers protesting for the same reason and using the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter to bring attention to their own independent events. They're not working together, hell, the only thing that ties these people together is the cause they use to march and the social media they use.



Your red herring is noted. However, there it has absolutely nothing to do with what we've been discussing for 2 pages now.

What part don't you get? It doesn't matter what name you want to associate with the NYC march/rally, the protestors were made up of some of the same activist groups as the one in DC. They carried the same damn "professional" signs hot off the printing press. What part don't you understand that there are so many names of activist groups all with their own personal agenda that now they are being defined in the media as "Black Lives Matter" because that is the name given to the events they organize.

Watch the first 10 seconds of this video, is the interviewer wrong just like CBS?

 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Yes, nobody has argued otherwise. What has been in question is your erroneous understanding of just what Black Lives Matter is. Did you forget that already? That you took issue with the fact that I laughed at a lawsuit towards an entity that does not exist on paper?



Damn it! You were starting off so well: Thousands join Al Sharpton in



The march Sharpton organized was called the JUSTICE FOR ALL. This has been explained to you by 3 other posters. How you can still get it so wrong is really insane.



Not it was not. Again, Zyphlin already addressed this nonsense. But I'll do it too just so you realize just how wrong you have it:

The Daily Fix: Families of Men Killed by Police to Join National March in Washington, D.C. | TakePart



The person who organized the event in NYC is called Synead Nichols.



Yes, this was an event promoted under the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter. You're starting to get it.



There is nothing confusing about this. You really make it obvious time and time again that you don't really know what it is you're discussing.



Lmao, this has already been proven false above. Sharpton organized one rally, Sinead Nichols organized another. They were two independent rallies organized under the same hashtag in different cities and states. Again, do you realize why I laughed at the idea that Black Lives Matter was going to be sued? It's as if you really don't get that there is nothing that can be sued under the name of "Black Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is not an organization. It's a whole bunch of different community organizers protesting for the same reason and using the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter to bring attention to their own independent events. They're not working together, hell, the only thing that ties these people together is the cause they use to march and the social media they use.



Your red herring is noted. However, there it has absolutely nothing to do with what we've been discussing for 2 pages now.

Lots of words to tell Vesper she's right, and no she's no red herring-but even if she was she'd beat you.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Agist? I haven't treated her any different than I treat you when it's clear you have no clue what you're discussing. Now move along, before I decide to destroy any of your ridiculous arguments in this thread.

Good place to start:

About Us | Black Lives Matter

Interesting how you think you know more than the MOA management. The internet certainly allows pretenders to sound important and informed. You and others are perfect examples of this part of the entertainment it provides.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

What part don't you get? It doesn't matter what name you want to associate with the NYC march/rally, the protestors were made up of some of the same activist groups as the one in DC.

Lmao, omfg. The rallies took place one the same day. So no, the rallies couldn't have been made up of the same protestors. The fact that the activists groups who organized them are entirely different people debunks you claim even further. I really wish you'd have a clue what it is you're discussing.

They carried the same damn "professional" signs hot off the printing press.

Lmao, what does that have to do with anything? Yes, this is the 21st century, people protesting the same cause can print similar signs. That doesn't make them part of the same organization or part of the same groups. Your arguments are really getting bizarre.

What part don't you understand that there are so many names of activist groups all with their own personal agenda that now they are being defined in the media as "Black Lives Matter" because that is the name given to the events they organize.

And still that is irrelevant to whether or not Black Lives Matter can be sued like you previously claimed they were going to be. As I've stated, Black Lives Matter is not going to get sued. Why? Because they're not a legal entity of any sort. This really is a pretty simple point.

Watch the first 10 seconds of this video, is the interviewer wrong just like CBS?

The fact that you're hiding behind MRC just shows how little interest you have in informing yourself. However, even by using their link you still don't understand just what black lives matter is. He said it was the blacklivesmatter rally promoted by his National Action Network. In simpler words, it's an event organized under the movement of #blacklivesmatter. Now, as per the name of the actual rally:

From the makers of your videos:

After publishing its original story by Jennifer Steinhauer and Elena Schneider on this Saturday's so-called "Justice For All" March in Washington, which also included coverage of New York's related event, the Times issued a correction which has to be seen to be believed (HT Twitchy): -

See more at: NYT Corrects Saturday 'Justice For All' Marches Coverage Twice, Ignores NYC 'We Want Dead Cops' Chants

'Justice For All,' 'Millions March' draw tens of thousands of protesters

Saturday's "Justice for All" march in downtown D.C., organized by civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton, brought together supporters of two black men: Eric Garner, who died as police in Staten Island, N.Y., tried to arrest him for selling loose cigarettes; and Michael Brown, who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Mo. Grand juries in both cases declined to indict the white officers on the scene.

Thousands join Al Sharpton in

Thousands join Al Sharpton in ‘Justice for All’ march in D.C.

...

The peaceful civil rights march led by families of the slain and organized by the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network drew a wide range of Americans — black, white, Latino, Asian, young and elderly. They walked east toward the U.S. Capitol in a stream of colorful T-shirts, banners and signs.

Why would Sharpton give the name of another organization to his organization's rally? Again, you just proved how little information you actually have on what Black Lives Matter is. Not only do you not understand it, you really don't know who is leading these protests, how they are connected or for that matter just how they're coming about. Again, the makes of your video acknowledge that it's called the Justice for All protest. Furthermore, your video establishes that it is a #blacklivesmatter protest, and that it is organized by ... wait... National Action Network? Why the hell would Sharpton organize an event for something other than his organization? Wait... I know:

Black Lives Matter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Black Lives Matter is a primarily American movement and hashtag

Bingo! Because Black Lives Matter is not an organization. It is actually a movement and a hashtag. A movement representing a common cause by multiple unaffiliated rally organizers, activists, etc. A movement which, I'll remind you for the last time: Can't be sued.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Lots of words to tell Vesper she's right, and no she's no red herring-but even if she was she'd beat you.

What are you even talking about? She claimed Black Lives Matter was a group and that it was going to be sued. I've already demonstrated that it can't be because it doesn't exist on paper. The fact that in this same page she admitted that it was some organizers that were going to be sued, after trying to argue endlessly that it was "Black Lives Matter" that was going to be sued is pretty indicative that she was in fact: wrong.
 
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

Good place to start:

About Us | Black Lives Matter

Interesting how you think you know more than the MOA management. The internet certainly allows pretenders to sound important and informed. You and others are perfect examples of this part of the entertainment it provides.

First line:

All #BlackLivesMatter. This is Not a Moment, but a Movement

First Paragraph:

#BlackLivesMatter was created in 2012 after Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman, was acquitted for his crime, and dead 17-year old Trayvon was post-humously placed on trial for his own murder. Rooted in the experiences of Black people in this country who actively resist our de-humanization, #BlackLivesMatter is a call to action and a response to the virulent anti-Black racism that permeates our society.Black Lives Matter is a unique contribution that goes beyond extrajudicial killings of Black people by police and vigilantes.

Hey and here I am:

Oh! Wait! They're a movement and a hashtag! So essentially trying to sue them is like saying you're going to sue Flower Power. Do you realize just how ridiculous you sound when you don't know the first thing about the "organization" that you believe can be sued?

It's fun to make people look really silly. Again, trying to sue Black Lives Matter is literally like trying to sue Flower Power. Not only is it completely laughable as there is no organization called Black Lives Matter, it would be like trying to sue The Beatnicks or Beatlemania. How do you bring a lawsuit against something which doesn't exist on paper? Can you sue Pro-Life? What about... can you sue... Pro-Gay-Marriage? How do you bring a lawsuit against these things? :lol: Wait! You can't!
 
Last edited:
Re: Did Al Sharpton's rhetoric contribute to the deaths of 2 NYPD Police officers?

First line:



First Paragraph:



Hey and here I am:



It's fun to make people look really silly. Again, trying to sue Black Lives Matter is literally like trying to sue Flower Power. Not only is it completely laughable as there is no organization called Black Lives Matter, it would be like trying to sue The Beatnicks or Beatlemania. How do you bring a lawsuit against something which doesn't exist on paper? Can you sue Pro-Life? What about... can you sue... Pro-Gay-Marriage? How do you bring a lawsuit against these things? :lol: Wait! You can't!

Truly, this must be your first day on earth.
 
Back
Top Bottom