Yes, nobody has argued otherwise. What has been in question is your erroneous understanding of just what
Black Lives Matter is. Did you forget that already? That you took issue with the fact that I laughed at a lawsuit towards an entity that does not exist on paper?
Damn it! You were starting off so well:
Thousands join Al Sharpton in
The march Sharpton organized was called the JUSTICE FOR ALL. This has been explained to you by 3 other posters. How you can still get it so wrong is really insane.
Not it was not. Again, Zyphlin already addressed this nonsense. But I'll do it too just so you realize just how wrong you have it:
The Daily Fix: Families of Men Killed by Police to Join National March in Washington, D.C. | TakePart
The person who organized the event in NYC is called Synead Nichols.
Yes, this was an event promoted under the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter. You're starting to get it.
There is nothing confusing about this. You really make it obvious time and time again that you don't really know what it is you're discussing.
Lmao, this has already been proven false
above. Sharpton organized one rally, Sinead Nichols organized another. They were two independent rallies organized under the same hashtag in different cities and states. Again, do you realize why I laughed at the idea that
Black Lives Matter was going to be sued? It's as if you really don't get that there is nothing that can be sued under the name of "Black Lives Matter". Black Lives Matter is not an organization. It's a whole bunch of different community organizers protesting for the same reason and using the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter to bring attention to their own independent events. They're not working together, hell, the only thing that ties these people together is the cause they use to march and the social media they use.
Your red herring is noted. However, there it has absolutely nothing to do with what we've been discussing for 2 pages now.