- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Your diatribe says you do not understand what you quoted.I understand that you are trying not to give any specifics. Without specific action it's a BS question like "Should more good things happen?" It also assumes that the government of Mexico is in some way responsible, which you have also failed to address.
The Mexican government is innocent until proven guilty, and unless you can do so they can't be held responsible. If you can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, then there's what the sentence would be. Which you also won't address.
The "How" of a "Yes" answer is totally dependent on the answerer's own beliefs.
Why that is so hard for some folks to understand, is beyond belief.
Why that is so hard for some folks to understand, is beyond belief.
As I also already said.
You do not need to know my beliefs to answer an in-general question.
If you do not believe they should be, then the only answer is "no".
If you believe they should be, the only answer is yes.
If you do not believe they should be, then the only answer is "no".
If you believe they should be, the only answer is yes.
And in-general question does not need specifics. Period.
If you want suggest ways as another has done, do so.
If not, no biggie.
And if you do not understand the "If", the following exchange already addressed your question of responsibility.
If LA was partially responsible for the crime committed in Texas? Of course.Would you hold LA responsible if one of its residents committed a crime in TX? Do you hold the US responsible when a US tourist commits a crime in another nation?
If the US allowed active encouragement in it's nation to break the other counties laws? Of course.