• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cigar robbery should cost a guy his life ?

cigar robbery costs a guy his life ?


  • Total voters
    34
if l was a guy and someone followed me while walking on the Street l would want to defend myself,maybe
You mean like a cop, sitting in a cop car, might defend himself from an asshole trying to beat his ass?

Good point...for the win.
 
She was saying it is not normal to follow somebody. This was in reference to the Martin case, not this one.

Zimmerman followed Martin because there had been robberies in the area and martin was unknown to him.

In that scenario, it is perfectly normal to follow somebody. Maybe not in Turkey, but certainly in the US.

Sorry - I was being a smartass.
 
no and there shouldnt be such a practice either.

One for all and all for none, right?

Every one is one their own in Turkey?

Nobody cares about anybody else in Turkey?
 
I wasn't referring to just stun guns when I used the word 'stun'. I used that word very broadly for any type of stunning.

We only have only form of stunning available to police at present and even then the availability and legally are limited.
 
No sweetie. What I am saying is that you don't need a gun to harm someone. He looked to be twice the size of the officer, and was charging towards him. He could have beaten him to a pulp, quite possibly without breaking a sweat.
l may agree.however my heart doesnt accept such dark killings
 
One for all and all for none, right?

Every one is one their own in Turkey?

Nobody cares about anybody else in Turkey?
yes they do but not this way ,by shooting other people whom they believe to be a suspect
 
no and there shouldnt be such a practice either.

Leads me to believe you're ignorant of what Neighborhood Watch is but still feel free to opine upon it.
 
yes they do but not this way ,by shooting other people whom they believe to be a suspect

That is not what happened and you know it.
 
If you attacked someone for walking near you, you would be the aggressor and someone could justifiably use force against you in self-defense.



Trayvon Martin attacked another man and hit his head into the concrete.

Aggression is always wrong.

All parents need to teach their young men to avoid these sorts of events is to know better than to attack folks, something pretty basic.


martin wasnt following zimmerman.zimmerman was following him....
 
b
Leads me to believe you're ignorant of what Neighborhood Watch is but still feel free to opine upon it.

lets stop claiming l am ignoranT.we keep an eye on our neighbours but without shooting anyone.this gun craziness makes me sick.people need to use gun in a country which is a World power..
 
Last edited:
b

lets stop claiming l am ignoranT.we keep an eye on our neighbours but without shooting anyone.this gun craziness makes me sick.people need to use gun in a country which is a World power.

Gun = World Power?

Perhaps you've discovered the connection and the principle behind it?
 
b

lets stop claiming l am ignoranT.we keep an eye on our neighbours but without shooting anyone.this gun craziness makes me sick.people need to use gun in a country which is a World power.

Then stop displaying the ignorance of our laws, our culture, our system and the events that take place here. You managed to misunderstand everything you've discussed in this thread. At first I thought this might be due to a language barrier, that perhaps you just cannot express your thoughts well in English. But that's becoming less likely by the moment.
 
We only have only form of stunning available to police at present and even then the availability and legally are limited.

You continue to misunderstand. When I used the word Stun, I was referring to anyone, and most types of stuns (relative to the circumstances). I never specified Police or individuals. I used the word very broadly.
 
You continue to misunderstand. When I used the word Stun, I was referring to anyone, and most types of stuns (relative to the circumstances). I never specified Police or individuals. I used the word very broadly.

So what other devices are available to the police or anyone that can stun? Do you know what stunning is? And no, you were talking about what the police should do with a suspect depending upon the suspect's propensity to cause harm.
 
Then stop displaying the ignorance of our laws, our culture, our system and the events that take place here. You managed to misunderstand everything you've discussed in this thread. At first I thought this might be due to a language barrier, that perhaps you just cannot express your thoughts well in English. But that's becoming less likely by the moment.

no personal attack ,more tolerance...
 
no personal attack ,more telorance...

It's not a personal attack, it's a comment on the ignorance of your argument. At the same time I gave you an out (language barrier) so you could save face if you wanted.
 
It's not a personal attack, it's a comment on the ignorance of your argument. At the same time I gave you an out (language barrier) so you could save face if you wanted.

And, still, to no avail.
 
= World Power. It's good to be on top. That's why so many are working to ignore those who will never get there.

No points for taking a knife to a gunfight.
 
= World Power. It's good to be on top. That's why so many are working to ignore those who will never get there.

you are one of those conservatives WHO think they are on top.........
 
you are one of those conservatives WHO think they are on top.........

Got news for you, if you knew anything about the US you'd know that liberals think we're on top too.
 
Back
Top Bottom