Greatness lies not in being strong, but in the right use of strength - Henry Ward Beecher
Baby sister, I was born game and I intend to go out that way - Rooster Cogburn
There are five scenarios:
1. If the robber is not detained, and currently threatening people with deadly force
-Deadly force should only be used to counter a currently present deadly force from another person/thing. If possible, stun a deadly person rather than kill.
2. If the robber is on the lose, and not able to threaten anyone.
-The robber can't harm anyone, so stunning is the most that should be used.
3. If the robber is on the lose, has killed someone, and is not able to threaten people.
-Same as above, unless the robber begins to threaten people with deadly force.
4. If the robber is on the lose, has killed someone, and is able to threaten people.
-Take the robber out, so at to prevent the lose of innocent life as much as possible. If the robber stops threatening people and surrenders, or puts him/herself in a scenario where they cannot threaten anyone else, then the most that can be used is stun force.
5. If the robber is detained, in prison, etc.
-Under no circumstances should a detained criminal, no matter the degree of their crimes, should be executed, because they cannot threaten anyone within society, They can and should be given extensive rehabilitation, and it is the humane thing to do.
It all comes down to whether they someone is threatening others with deadly force or not.
Last edited by ThesisQuasar; 11-26-14 at 01:01 PM.
A Canadian conservative is one who believes in limited government and that the government should stay out of our wallets and out of our bedrooms.
what will you say about Martin ?
was he trying to harm anyone when zimmer wanted to follow him ?
isnt there anhone WHO want to agree with this fact ?
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken." ATATÜRK