• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Deportation Question.

Could you deport them personally or not?


  • Total voters
    55
I've owned quite a few of those older vehicles, and trust me: The ones they make today are far superior.
I have too, and I don't disagree. Probably what keeps me in the present. Older vehicles are best for nostalgia and hobby purposes, not daily drivers.
 
Every now and then I toy with the idea of buying only older vehicles (early 70s and older).

It'd be nice not to be immediately susceptible to an EMP burst.
 
Not so fast. It is not an employer's job to enforce the law in the sense of arresting and prosecuting illegal immigrants. It is, however, the employer's responsibility to obey the laws, and the law says they are not allowed to hire illegal immigrants. So, being the law-abiding person that you seem to be, you advocate prosecution of employers breaking the law by hiring illegal immigrants, correct?



We have too many felonies already. Are you willing to downgrade some felonies to misdemeanors? If so, which ones?

No, im against laws which say who a person can or can not hire. Attack the problem at the source, which is the border.
 
No, im against laws which say who a person can or can not hire. Attack the problem at the source, which is the border.
The notion that an employer should be able to legally employ a person who is in the country illegally is simply loony.

By your rationale we should also repeal all child labor laws and put 7 yr olds back to work in the coal mines. Or, is that somehow "different"? The 7 yr old in the coal mine is actually more defensible if they're a citizen.
 
Encumbrance is a GOOD thing. Its the whole point.

Well, if it's a good thing that legislators be encumbered you may need a new legislative system. I mean, it's not like the Constitution was delivered to Moses on top of a mountain or whispered by Allah into James Madison's ear. How many times has it been modified and re-modified and how much turmoil does the process cause? I guess we'll find out with this 'anchor baby' issue.
 
The notion that an employer should be able to legally employ a person who is in the country illegally is simply loony.

By your rationale we should also repeal all child labor laws and put 7 yr olds back to work in the coal mines. Or, is that somehow "different"? The 7 yr old in the coal mine is actually more defensible if they're a citizen.

Yes, thats exactly what I meant.
 
Well, if it's a good thing that legislators be encumbered you may need a new legislative system. I mean, it's not like the Constitution was delivered to Moses on top of a mountain or whispered by Allah into James Madison's ear. How many times has it been modified and re-modified and how much turmoil does the process cause? I guess we'll find out with this 'anchor baby' issue.

17 times in 250 years (after the initial bill of rights). Proof that it was written pretty well. Encumberence is even written in the Declaration of Independance.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes
 
Back
Top Bottom