Again, your syllogisms are based on false assumptions, thus your conclusions are untrue.
I've highlighted in red one of your invalid assumptions.
And, where the illegal parents came from is not necessarily the region in that country where they choose to return.
Your assumption that the illegal aliens always or usually come from a place where they'll be returning that would be considered by CPS to be unsafe-unacceptable to U.S. citizen children is simply false; you have no knowledge of the "always or usually" circumstances from which they came.
But your bottom line of your argument here is simply to excuse the illegal aliens crimes based on your albeit false assumption that illegal aliens are always coming from a place that's unacceptable-unsafe to CPS for U.S. citizen children.
Again, not an excuse to commit crime.
The overwhelming vast majority of those in similar socioeconomic-geopolitical situations to the very tiny fragment of those who choose to become criminals and steal from Americans simply do not choose to become such criminals.
The illegal aliens in the situation you imagine could have applied for asylum .. or, like the vast majority of their fellow countrymen, they could have stayed and worked for change.
CPS doesn't reach in and extract children out of poverty enclaves in America.
I think you exaggerate in imagining what CPS will deem unacceptable.
I clearly said that the illegal alien parents get first choice. And, they do -- that's a fact.
If they choose to leave their children here, that's their choice.
Only if they choose to take their kids with them does CPS get involved for U.S. citizen children to insure they'll be living in safe-acceptable circumstances.
Stop misquoting me.
Your typical libertarian "big bad government" meme you display here is simply that.