- Joined
- Aug 1, 2009
- Messages
- 27,482
- Reaction score
- 6,506
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Well, given that he is now officially on record as drugging a woman into a stupor to have sex with her, I'd have to go with rapist.
I withheld judgement when this first came up. Although false violent crime accusations are rare, they can be more common with the wealthy (all types, not just rape). The sheer number was also suspect. I didn't believe he was innocent, and I didn't believe he was guilty. Not enough information.
But now it is known that he drugged women for sex. We call that rape.
So yes, he is a rapist.
How do you get to "drugging a woman into a stupor to have sex with her" from what he said.
When you offered a woman a Quaalude in the 70s she took it. Are you saying he forced these women to take the drugs? I didn't see him admit to that.