• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ferguson MO??

Ferguson MO Grand jury decision readiness.

  • Yes, they place will explode

    Votes: 10 62.5%
  • Yes, all parties will peacfully accept the finding

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, its just a time consuming process

    Votes: 4 25.0%
  • No, but the govenor loves sabre rattling

    Votes: 2 12.5%

  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
Let's entertain that for a second

taser's, pepper spray and police baton's easily subdue a suspect combating the police
who happen to resist arrest or detainment

Now my question is what justified the officer in stopping this kid in the first place?
if it was to harass!!! then the officer or officers need to lose their jobs, if the situation
was? cause they spotted him in the commission of a crime or in the process of fleeing
from a committed crime

then the officer/officers are justified to pursue the suspect and bring him to detainment

scenario 2 - the only time law enforcement is allowed to use lethal force? is when the
suspect has removed the service revolver of the officer, and has attempted to flee or is
the process of using his/her own weapon against law enforcement

if this kid was unarmed and he was shot the officer is guilty of crime plan and simple
There is also a disparity of size. No officer is expected to take a beating by a much larger person.
And ordering someone out of the street is not harassment.
 
Let's entertain that for a second

taser's, pepper spray and police baton's easily subdue a suspect combating the police
who happen to resist arrest or detainment

Now my question is what justified the officer in stopping this kid in the first place?
if it was to harass!!! then the officer or officers need to lose their jobs, if the situation
was? cause they spotted him in the commission of a crime or in the process of fleeing
from a committed crime

then the officer/officers are justified to pursue the suspect and bring him to detainment

scenario 2 - the only time law enforcement is allowed to use lethal force? is when the
suspect has removed the service revolver of the officer, and has attempted to flee or is
the process of using his/her own weapon against law enforcement

if this kid was unarmed and he was shot the officer is guilty of crime plan and simple
Cop hate much?
 
Oh lord. When you come in here late to the game, of course you're going to have lots of questions and be full to the brim with what you think are new and significant points. Here's a tip: you've brought nothing new to the table except to parrot long answered and thoroughly debated questions.

The forum has a search function. Try using it and read up. Educate yourself first.

I maybe late to this particular discussion on this particular forum...but it doesn't
mean I am less educated on a subject, and the fact is no law enforcement officer
has a right to shoot or kill a unarmed man

cause then if that is the case? then the next guy brought in for shooting
a homeless man, or killing a child should receive a slap on the wrist
 
I maybe late to this particular discussion on this particular forum...but it doesn't
mean I am less educated on a subject, and the fact is no law enforcement officer
has a right to shoot or kill a unarmed man

From the questions you're asking and your apparent lack of accurate information, yes, that's precisely what it means.

cause then if that is the case? then the next guy brought in for shooting
a homeless man, or killing a child should receive a slap on the wrist

And now you're just doubling down on the newbie to the discussion thing. If you need help with that search function, just let us know.
 
there are varying degrees of violence. Not just the place will explode or nothing will happen.
Judging from the previous events, I don't think its just going to be a couple of store front broken.
 
I dont much care. Know some people in st louie area but not near there.
 
Cop hate much?

I think he is useful as a kind of weathervane of the intellectual depth of the kind of people we are dealing with here. Protesters in Ferguson aren't going to be swayed by the simple fact that the central claim that they are protesting over is incorrect.
 
From the questions you're asking and your apparent lack of accurate information, yes, that's precisely what it means.

I am questioning what he knows?? please learn the difference

And now you're just doubling down on the newbie to the discussion thing. If you need help with that search function, just let us know.

I am willing to debate any one on this topic not just him
 
prove he had a weapon and prove he was actually pointing it at the officer which gave him justification to fire upon him

That's not how things work, SOB. Just because your brain thinks it is, doesn't make it so.
 
Last edited:
The problem is regardless of how the decision turns out!

you have a hate crime that took place so nobody wins
unless these cops who did this? are sentenced to death
for their crimes I expect a full onset riot to take place
either way

There was no hate crime. Nothing that took place happened because of anyone's skin color.

You've got a punk who thinks he's the big cheese in town assaulting a store owner and stealing cigars. Then same punk who thinks he doesn't have to listen to a police officer's orders to simply get out of the street goes bat crap crazy on said police officer, tries to get his gun, punches him and then comes at the police officer like an angry bull toward a waving flag. Moral of the story -- 1. Don't take things that aren't yours. 2. Don't assault innocent people. 3. Don't assault a police officer unless you're willing and ready to meet your Maker.

Everything that occurred was the fault of Michael Brown. No one else.
 
There was no hate crime. Nothing that took place happened because of anyone's skin color.

You've got a punk who thinks he's the big cheese in town assaulting a store owner and stealing cigars. Then same punk who thinks he doesn't have to listen to a police officer's orders to simply get out of the street goes bat crap crazy on said police officer, tries to get his gun, punches him and then comes at the police officer like an angry bull toward a waving flag. Moral of the story -- 1. Don't take things that aren't yours. 2. Don't assault innocent people. 3. Don't assault a police officer unless you're willing and ready to meet your Maker.

Everything that occurred was the fault of Michael Brown. No one else.



Do you have secret access to the secret Grand Jury proceedings?
 
A few bad apples. I dont think "its gonna explode!!!". There will be a few bad apples like always.
Seems more like a rotten barrel to me. Not just a few bad apples.

Rapes, robberies etc. etc.

Why do you excuse rape?
 
Now my question is what justified the officer in stopping this kid in the first place?
Kid?!?!??! WTF?

That 6' 4" 292 pound extremely aggressive ADULT was fleeing the scene of a convenience store robbery.
 
Last edited:
People who are butthurt about the possibility of a few blacks rioting more than they are about probability of an entire race of people being systematically disenfranchised have their priorities--and their targets of anger--seriously out-of-whack.

Lol !

You sound a little butt hurt.

Get over it
 
prove he had a weapon and prove he was actually pointing it at the officer which gave him justification to fire upon him


Absolute nonsense. Hard to believe there are adults out there that think like you.

The existence of a weapon doesn't determine whether ir not deadly force is justified.

I suppose the Cop should have just let Brown beat him unconscious and then just hoped that he wouldn't get a bullet in his head from his own gun for his trouble.
 
I dont much care. Know some people in st louie area but not near there.


After the Brown shooting the violence wasn't just isolated to Ferguson.

If you have a conceal carry permit, then use it
 
10690182_10153375949618327_1955748327112280389_n.jpg
 
Michael Brown was just an innocent little boy :roll:

MBrown.JPG

26290847_BG1.jpg


Gentle little peaceful giant throttles a clerk half his size..... :roll:

/sarcasm

Anyone who defends Michael Brown is most likely an ignorant racist scumbag. Or maybe just an idiot.
 
Last edited:
Let's entertain that for a second

taser's, pepper spray and police baton's easily subdue a suspect combating the police
who happen to resist arrest or detainment

Now my question is what justified the officer in stopping this kid in the first place?
if it was to harass!!! then the officer or officers need to lose their jobs, if the situation
was? cause they spotted him in the commission of a crime or in the process of fleeing
from a committed crime

then the officer/officers are justified to pursue the suspect and bring him to detainment

scenario 2 - the only time law enforcement is allowed to use lethal force? is when the
suspect has removed the service revolver of the officer, and has attempted to flee or is
the process of using his/her own weapon against law enforcement

if this kid was unarmed and he was shot the officer is guilty of crime plan and simple


It is also lawful to defend one's self when being beaten to a pulp and you are in fear for your life. So even if you take your scenario 2 and take out the fact that the guy was a cop, he still has the right as a human to defend himself. I have not heard one person say that cop wasn't getting his ass handed to him up until he shot the guy, all while being in the car still.
 
Whether the 'city explodes' or not has little to do with the verdict and almost everything to do with poverty and America's ongoing obsession with how much melanin is in one's skin.

This verdict is not the possible cause of a riot...it's just the excuse for one.
 
Back
Top Bottom