• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was liberalism rejected in the midterms?

Was liberalism rejected in the mid term elections?

  • Im a right leaning American, yes.

    Votes: 14 21.5%
  • Im a right leaning American, no.

    Votes: 12 18.5%
  • Im a left leaning American, yes.

    Votes: 3 4.6%
  • Im a left leaning American, no.

    Votes: 32 49.2%
  • Im a not American, yes.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Im a not American, no.

    Votes: 4 6.2%

  • Total voters
    65
Just my 2 cents but, as soon as The GOP can rid their party of the stereotypical birthers and truthers, "they're coming for your guns," nutter's, racist and bigoted minority, the Cruz, Bachmann, Limbaugh thinkers and Palin types, and replace their ranks with socially liberal voters and fiscal conservatives, who are less bent on dividing the masses by use of ludicrous propaganda, we can kiss the Democrat party good-bye for a long time, (until the pendulum returns anyways.)

My opinion is that America is ready for that. A third party won't do any good. ( A fart in a whirlwind.) The GOP needs to get back to what it use to be, once upon a time. Before the whacko hijacking.

I do agree if the GOP got back to say, Eisenhower times, they would pull a lot of voters away from Dems. 1956 Republican platform:
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities

Protect Social Security

Provide asylum for refugees

Extend minimum wage

Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people

Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union

Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex
 
I do agree if the GOP got back to say, Eisenhower times, they would pull a lot of voters away from Dems. 1956 Republican platform:
Provide federal assistance to low-income communities

Protect Social Security

Provide asylum for refugees

Extend minimum wage

Improve unemployment benefit system so it covers more people

Strengthen labor laws so workers can more easily join a union

Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of sex

Yes, that is when I used to be a proud republican. Back in those days, people pretty much kept their politics to themselves and voiced their support, for whatever party, at the voting booth. Democrats and Republicans both were American first, above all.

Now, we have the choice of Dumb or Dumber. And I will leave it up to the individual to formulate their own opinion as to which is "Dumber." However, statistics show, by party identification, which is considered "Dumber," by most Americans, at this point and time.
 
It was a bad night for dems and dem policies. Exit polls show Americans were not happy with the left.

This whole thread and premise is idiotic because it ignores how conservative ballot measures went down in flames and liberal measures soared. And that's with a low overall turn out and a low democrat turn out. Furthermore, many Republicans had relatively close matches in states that should have been easy wins. A Democrat in several states shouldn't have even been a threat yet both state and national parties threw millions at redder than red states to hold on to seats. The GOP won, but to say that voters rejected liberalism when liberal ballot measures hands down won, GOP seats that should have been safe required millions in spending and with a very sad turn out is asinine.
 
Liberalism, no

Democrats, yes

Although with fewer than half showing up, what was really rejected was democracy
 
Back
Top Bottom