Assume a person who hates homosexuals with a vengeance owns a small duplex and occupies one of the units. Can he be forced by law to rent the other unit to homosexuals, such that he's constantly made aware of whatever activities are taking place on the other side of the common wall? After all, he is engaging in business by renting housing for profit. And if he's renting a room in his house, same answer? Does every person who engages in any transaction that involves commerce, to any degree, waive his freedoms of association, speech, and privacy by doing so?
What about an artist who paints portraits for a living and detests homosexuality as sinful? If a homosexual couple asks him to paint a portrait of them, partially clothed and locked in a fond embrace, can a public accommodation law require him to do it? How about a criminal lawyer who hates homosexuals--should he be considered a public accommodation, so that he has to defend a homosexual client who requests it? If you didn't know, the state public accommodation law at issue in Roberts v. Jaycees applied to "any business." Should only people you and your friends like have constitutional rights? Shouldn't icky haters be punished for daring not to approve of everything good so-called liberals have deemed noble and wonderful?