If a thief stole, lets say here, a pair of chair of mine, they in now way "restricted my freedom". They took a chair, not my "freedom". Or lets put it into a better perspective. Since this argument seems to be put in the lense of private property. Is it against someones freedom to be not allowed to own 100% of land in a state?So if a common thief stole your property and threw money at you everything about that situation would be fine with you? Interesting.