2.) nothing "evil" about it in general and also many republicans support abortion just like many dems do not
3.) well the fed arent in the debate, there isnt one but the point again is, if its part of the running platform it will lose him the election, its that simple.
those issues can NOT be focused on in a presidential platform because they will run a person out of the race
if you would like to discuss those issues theres MANY threads on them, dont want to derail here
Non-interventionism Non-interventionism – is the belief that political rulers should avoid military alliances with other nations and to avoid interfering in wars bearing no direct impact on their nation. However, most non-interventionists are supporters of free trade, travel, and support certain international agreements, unlike isolationists.
Thanks for proving my point.
"Men did not make the earth ... it is the value of the improvement only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property... Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds." -- Thomas Paine, Agrarian Justice
Paul makes no claim of non intervention but he again refers to the constitution. Isnt this what we want from our potus?
While some scholars, such as Robert J. Art, believe that the United States has an isolationist history, other scholars dispute this by describing the United States as following a strategy of unilateralism or non-interventionism instead. Robert Art makes his argument in A Grand Strategy for America (2003). Books that have made the argument that the United States followed unilaterism instead of isolationism include Walter A. McDougall's Promised Land, Crusader State (1997), John Lewis Gaddis's Surprise, Security, and the American Experience (2004), and Bradley F. Podliska's Acting Alone (2010). Both sides claim policy prescriptions from George Washington's Farewell Address as evidence for their argument.