Who thinks that the U.S. should either commit 500K troops or more, like the original Gulf War, and seriously just take over the Iraq, Syria situation or let it drag out for another 10-30yrs and keep using just enough half measures to cost us much more in the long run?
Or of course, the other option is to completely pull out and stay out this time, then let whoever is able take over Iraq and whatever other ME regions?
But are there really anymore than these three options, and why does fighting to win seem like such a bad PR campaign? The collateral damage is literally going to be worse if dragged out but it won't appear all at once like a massive offensive.
I think Obama must be overwhelmed with all the Media Headlines and almost daily calamities being reported on?
Obama: 'There’s A Sense ... The World Is Spinning So Fast and Nobody Is Able To Control It'