- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Why should I take you seriously when you say again and again that you believe in something while not believing what it is premised upon?
It make no difference to me since your mind is already made up and seems to be rather rigid and unyielding.
You now claim your belief in the Constitution is based in pragmatics . . . Well, I'm glad you have chosen to base your belief on something that "exists" in the physical world that can be "proven to exist" as opposed to a subjective metaphysical "belief system".
Yes - pragmatics - what works and works well - is something which can is very much part of the real world.
Your pragmatics only operate until the next guy like you comes along with a different argument that dismisses the constraints of the Constitution
the so called next guy can be one of your own fellow believers who one day is prostrating himself beside you before the same altar and worshipping the same gods and then the next day disagrees with you on facets of that same belief.
here it is a nutshell for you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3fAcxcxoZ8
Last edited: