- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
claiming that this only part of the bill of rights failed to acknowledge an individual right is just silly.
what prior natural right do you claim the founders wanted to recognize
give it up Haymarket, you have twisted your arguments into a pretzel and they are contradicting each other
Not at all is it silly. I have shown you how the decision could have been written. You do not like that. Fine. But I have shown it just the same.
You are merely against it because my approach would have reaffirmed the right of Congress to pass regulations in this area and are against that as part of your own political belief system. You being against the approach does NOT make it contradictory nor silly. It simply makes you against it because of your own beliefs and political agenda.
As to a prior natural right - there is no such thing and you have never been able to prove any such thing exists outside of a willful belief which exists only in the mind of the believer.
Last edited: