• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is There Such a Thing as "White Privilege"?

Is there such a thing as White Privilege?

  • Yes

    Votes: 50 59.5%
  • No

    Votes: 34 40.5%

  • Total voters
    84
Do you know what an anecdote is? It doesn't matter whether its your anecdote or a newspapers anecdote, it's still anecdotal.

Furthermore, I have already said that other racial privileges exist, they were not without privilege. They (probably) had the privilege of being born in the USA, and not in Mozambique, for example.

You seem to have cultivated an unhealthy us v them mentality in your mind.

Do you know what a newspaper report is? It wasn't anecdotal, or else they would call it that. Have you ever heard of a news anecdoter? Try to keep up.

You seem to be rather petty with your uncalled for English lessons.

And you would think that if they had the 'privilege' of being born in the USA they would have no reason to claim they are AFRICAN American.

Next dumbass comment.
 
Whites do have a congressional Caucus. Its called the Tea Party :)

Nice try. The tea party is not a white organization. But I'm guessing you already knew that.
 
What whiner wrote this nonsensical crap you cribbed from "Metapedia"?

Whiner? This is about black whinery. Click on the link and see if you can determine who wrote it. Otherwise just pretend that I did.
 
You can work damn hard and still experience the privilege.

And yes, it exists.

So does BLACK privilege. You see, while we are working those lazy slugs are sitting on their fat asses letting the crackers pay for their very existence.
 
Whiner? This is about black whinery. Click on the link and see if you can determine who wrote it. Otherwise just pretend that I did.

I think you fail to understand why there are minority programs and caucuses.

These groups exists to make sure that minority issues are represented. If minority issues held the same weight as White related issues then there would be no purpose for the organizations.

Simple as that.
 
So does BLACK privilege. You see, while we are working those lazy slugs are sitting on their fat asses letting the crackers pay for their very existence.


Have you visit some of your local trailer parks lately?
 
If he is being more vigilant with one race, then by definition he is being less vigilant with another?

Vigilance is not a pie equally split between races. You can watch certain people more closely, but that doesn't mean you are not watching other people too.
 
Nice try. The tea party is not a white organization. But I'm guessing you already knew that.

The NAACP have white members. But I bet you classify them as a black organization right?
 
I wish I had a answer to to your question. I guess it is a human flaw in us. We gravitate to what we know and are use to. I don't necessarily think it is racism, but more like favoritism.

But that's not universal. We wouldn't see "mixed race" couples if color were the only issue.
 
Of course not. The President of the United States has no jurisdiction over who police choose to arrest or not arrest. He does not have the power to snap his fingers and fix everything single ****ing problem in the entire country.

Well of course he does, silly.....

Unless of course, the President is a Republican. then nothing is his fault. See gas prices.
 
We're talking about white privilege, not Asian women driving. Good grief, the drama from you is a sight to behold.

By the way, some day - not today because I don't care - you can show me where my hatred and intolerance for Asian women drivers is, and how it is I refuse to accept them. But I'll let you carry on in the meantime with your crying over my comments about Asian women being bad drivers yesterday. Have fun! Buy some tissues.

After living in Las Vegas for over 10 years and driving behind cars with plates from all 50 states, I found that Utah drivers are the worst.

Am I a bigot too?
 
Last edited:
Well of course he does, silly.....

Unless of course, the President is a Republican. then nothing is his fault. See gas prices.

I think you meant "Democrat" unless you've been living under a rock for the past 6 years.
 
I'm not sure how anyone can deny the presence of male white privilege. Saying it does not exist simply does not pass the smell test.

Why did you add the word "male"?
 
After living in Las Vegas for over 10 years and driving beh9ind cars with plates from all 50 states, I found that Utah drivers are the worst.

Am I a bigot too?

You could be. Or you could be nuts. Did you ever drive behind a driver from Massachusetts?:shock:
 
The NAACP have white members. But I bet you classify them as a black organization right?

They classify themselves as a black organization. The tea party does not. And in fact, has nothing to do with race.
 
I'm from Los Angeles. Please tell me exactly this place is? I never heard any of my white friends say that they were pulled over because they were white.

Especially by the LAPD !!!!

He wasn't referring to the police.
 
You could be. Or you could be nuts. Did you ever drive behind a driver from Massachusetts?:shock:

There are not that many in Vegas but Utah is the worst. Slow and careful loses the race in Vegas.
 
The only way I'd say it's a "liability" is that you are not eligible for a lot of the same benefits that minorities might be.

Other whites also tend to, largely subconsciously, hold your behavior to a higher standard of conduct than they would a person of minority descent, and be quite a bit more punitive in judging what they determine to be a failure to meet those standards.

I work retail, for instance. We've got black employees here who routinely show up 10 to 15 minutes late for work, suck at customer service, and randomly disappear for thirty minutes at a time or more during their shifts to fiddle around with their cell phones. Yet... No one ever says anything, nor do they lose their jobs.

Me, on the other hand? I can't even take a dump on the job without having some grouchy manager give me a hard time over it.

Hell! I got caught glancing at my cell phone to check my messages one time, and it was brought up in every performance review I had for the next 6 months! :lol:

Let me put it in another way for you looking through my experience.

In the corporate world, I can't speak out and get angry like my white co-workers because I know that this is what is expected from us and I don't want to shut the door on other blacks coming in. This is a very common train of thought with black professionals. I have to be the perfect angel where whites don't have that pressure on them because they are the ones in power and 9 times out of 10, they are the majority.

My wife who is very experience in her profession, has a first name that very common for black women. She had a hard time getting call for interviews. When her told her to use her middle name which is held normally by whites, she started getting phone calls....Imagine that.

I try to tell people (Both black and White) that just because you don't experience it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
 
So does BLACK privilege. You see, while we are working those lazy slugs are sitting on their fat asses letting the crackers pay for their very existence.

:roll:

What I would pay to see you say this in person to a black person but that would take some balls, right? :lol:
 
Vigilance is not a pie equally split between races. You can watch certain people more closely, but that doesn't mean you are not watching other people too.

Their time/concentration is. Again, if they are racially profiling to watch certain people more, then by definition there must be a less. They can still monitor other races but not to the extent that they could be, because they are concentrating on one particular race.

In a simplified case, if a border patrol (easier example than a shopkeeper but same principle) can process 10 cars in a day, they should monitor 5 black drivers and 5 white. If they instead choose to check 7 black drivers for drugs, then not only is that 2 potential white drug dealers who get to go straight through, but even if it is completely random as to which color driver has drugs, they will catch more black drivers with drugs than white drivers, even though they monitor white drivers aswell. Again, this fuels their confirmation bias and tomorrow they'll likely profile black drivers again because of yesterdays results. The cycle perpetuates.
 
To whom was he referring to?

I would guess gang members. Drive through some sections of LA and you can get shot just for being there.

Is that something you do not know?
 
Hmmmmmm okay. We will see after 2016.

We don't need to wait. The tea party has never been a race based organization, and you know it. But please, don't let that stop you from spreading disinformation.
 
You could be. Or you could be nuts. Did you ever drive behind a driver from Massachusetts?:shock:

Greetings, tres borrachos. :2wave:

Once. I promised the fates if they would just let me get out of Boston alive, I would never again visit there! I've kept my word! :mrgreen:

Love your Halloween avatar! :thumbs:
 
Back
Top Bottom