We arn't talking about Money being an Enhancement to speach or something like that, we are saying Money = Speach.
what is the argument against Direct contributions?
I mean can the government regulate me talking to my representative? As opposed to just talking on a soap Box? No, if Money is speach then how can they regulate giving Money to politicians?
So do you think Money is speach?Money is speech is simply the reverse of the mantra. Taking both statements as statements of doctrine leads to absolutist absurdities like your post suggests.