• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who should be embarrassed by the drunken Palin brawl the most?

This is embarassing for:


  • Total voters
    47
Because we all know how much Conservatives care about poor people. :lamo:lamo:lamo

Since they give so much more time and money to charity, and actually want people to KEEP what they earn, so they THEY (not govt) can spend it, I dont find your claim credible.
 
Most americans are doing better now than they were in 2009 after Bush's recession.

That is categorically false. If it were true, then we know the average income per household would have gone up. Instead, it has gone down. THAT makes them better off?

Median Household Income History in the United States

Fewer people are working today than over the past 76 years (labor participation rate). THAT makes them better off?

More people are surviving based on gifts from the federal government - something that can be taken away at any time. THAT makes them better off?
 
Liberal love poor people so much that they have policies crafted to create more of them, and to keep more of them that way.

That is the dumbest thing I have read in a while. Its the repukes who want immigrants who can't vote. They would love a caste system.
 
That is the dumbest thing I have read in a while. Its the repukes who want immigrants who can't vote. They would love a caste system.

So, it's “repukes” who, at this time, are responsible for policies that are encouraging hordes of foreign invaders to illegally cross our borders?
 
Your glee at being able to trash Obamas daughter...when she turns 18, of course.

Your inability to understand the written word is astounding.

With liberals taking the lead, I said when she turns 18 she is fair game.

There is no glee there, but you have to follow the rules.

I, personally, don't give a **** about Obama's daughters and I don't know why anybody would.
 
Their side has been doing that to Mr. Obama's daughters since the first election, as I proved in my separate thread.
Just as they did to Amy Carter and Chelsea Clinton.
Not to mention every name in their racist book at the FLOTUS, such as "monkey" .
Your glee at being able to trash Obamas daughter...when she turns 18, of course.
 
With liberals taking the lead, I said when she turns 18 she is fair game.
Why would anyone's daughters be fair game, as you say, when they turn 18?

There is no glee there, but you have to follow the rules.
What "rules" would those be where you could attack someone's daughters when they turn 18?
I, personally, don't give a **** about Obama's daughters and I don't know why anybody would.
Then you should tell your GOP pols and media-types to stop doing this .
 
So, it's “repukes” who, at this time, are responsible for policies that are encouraging hordes of foreign invaders to illegally cross our borders?
'Cause it's the empoloyers ho are the crimiunals here.

Who would you guess employ more illegal immigrants, liberals or conservatives? 'Cause it's the employers who are the criminals here.
 
So, it's “repukes” who, at this time, are responsible for policies that are encouraging hordes of foreign invaders to illegally cross our borders?

No its Repukes who would agree on keeping those already here only if they jumped through a million hoops and were not eligible to vote. Even then they spout that no amnesty bull**** as if all the immigrants who came here earlier were so much better. Children are fleeing gangs, violence , drugs and poverty in Mexico and Latin America. Its all Obama's fault.
 
Except for the, you know, EYEWITNESSES.

I guess the police report saying alcohol was involved is just a confirmation.

You started this thread to demean the Palins on hearsay. The blog from which this story emerged and ABC and other MSM picked up is a POLITICAL BLOG and all are using the word "alleged" to describe what happened for a reason. If there is a police report, the Palin family could not have been questioned at the party as the same POLITICAL BLOG that started this story claims the Palins had left the party before the police arrived. The eyewitness claims he saw Bristol give some guy a right hook to the jaw. But he didn't say why she hit the guy. So what did the guy do to Bristol for her to respond with a right hook? The guy she allegedly hit sure as heck hasn't commented on it. Why is that?
 
You started this thread to demean the Palins on hearsay. The blog from which this story emerged and ABC and other MSM picked up is a POLITICAL BLOG and all are using the word "alleged" to describe what happened for a reason. If there is a police report, the Palin family could not have been questioned at the party as the same POLITICAL BLOG that started this story claims the Palins had left the party before the police arrived. The eyewitness claims he saw Bristol give some guy a right hook to the jaw. But he didn't say why she hit the guy. So what did the guy do to Bristol for her to respond with a right hook? The guy she allegedly hit sure as heck hasn't commented on it. Why is that?

I have been waiting breathlessly for two days for updates to this latest adventure of the most important person of our times. Given the understandably insatiable curiosity about Palin and her family (remember Joe McGinniss moving in next door in Wasilla?) and the willingness of some news outlets to exploit even her little boy, I am terribly disappointed that Harvey Levin hasn't produced the shocking details.

Yet. Stay hopeful, Vesper. ;)
 
Why would anyone other than the people involved in the brawl care about it?

There are brawls all the time whenever the Yankees come to town to play the Red Sox. I'm not embarrassed by that. I'm never involved.
 
Why would anyone other than the people involved in the brawl care about it?

There are brawls all the time whenever the Yankees come to town to play the Red Sox. I'm not embarrassed by that. I'm never involved.

Yet if it was Malia Obama beating the crap out of some guy at Fenway..,You might be interested.
 
The Palin clan continues their Jerry Springer antics, this time beating up people at a party and generally trashing the place.

All of the Palins, including her divorced child, both highschool dropouts (or are there three now?) and apparently a couple of the out of wedlock kids, were all at a party and it turned ugly. Just like the traditional families we all strive to be in.

This half term governor/reality show failure/Ivanka Trump wannabee is sure showing us why a McCain/Palin vote would have been a disaster for the nation.



Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl - ABC News

While I'm sure we'll have some relexive defenders from the usual suspects, who do you think should be most aghast at this latest event?

Let's see...

...Bristol Palin--a girl--throws six punches at a guy--allegedly a "male"-- and the whole family is guilty of "Jerry Springer antics"?

Really?

And then you attack her other kids when they've been accused--by your own source--of nothing!

But still you ask who should be embarrassed by all of this?

You should be embarrassed.

This is a petty, small-minded, ignorant, back-water, inbred character assassination on your part.

Has anybody thought to ask what the guy did to deserve the punches?
 
I have been waiting breathlessly for two days for updates to this latest adventure of the most important person of our times. Given the understandably insatiable curiosity about Palin and her family (remember Joe McGinniss moving in next door in Wasilla?) and the willingness of some news outlets to exploit even her little boy, I am terribly disappointed that Harvey Levin hasn't produced the shocking details.

Yet. Stay hopeful, Vesper. ;)

I've never in my lifetime seen a conservative female in politics put through the wringer as she has. One can certainly understand her hate relationship with the media. Ironically, this latest hit piece coincides with Palin launching an Internet newscast where the political news of the day will be discussed without the filters the MSM uses in picking and choosing what stories to cover while barring political correctness. The MSM, who often shows themselves to be an arm of the Democratic Party, may find this somewhat of a threat as it will focus on the stories the MSM refuses to cover bringing to light they no longer just report the news but pick and choose what stories to run to mold public opinion. There's been several journalists come forth as of late telling how their investigative reporting of certain stories has been censored (CBS, NBC, and ABC) because they were unfavorable to the current administration. If excerpts of these Palin newscasts start showing up on other websites as well as YouTube, it could pose a challenge to the MSM. Just a thought......
 
I've never in my lifetime seen a conservative female in politics put through the wringer as she has. One can certainly understand her hate relationship with the media. Ironically, this latest hit piece coincides with Palin launching an Internet newscast where the political news of the day will be discussed without the filters the MSM uses in picking and choosing what stories to cover while barring political correctness. The MSM, who often shows themselves to be an arm of the Democratic Party, may find this somewhat of a threat as it will focus on the stories the MSM refuses to cover bringing to light they no longer just report the news but pick and choose what stories to run to mold public opinion. There's been several journalists come forth as of late telling how their investigative reporting of certain stories has been censored (CBS, NBC, and ABC) because they were unfavorable to the current administration. If excerpts of these Palin newscasts start showing up on other websites as well as YouTube, it could pose a challenge to the MSM. Just a thought......


Sounds like poutrage.
 


Let's see...

...Bristol Palin--a girl--throws six punches at a guy--allegedly a "male"-- and the whole family is guilty of "Jerry Springer antics"?

Really?

And then you attack her other kids when they've been accused--by your own source--of nothing!

But still you ask who should be embarrassed by all of this?

You should be embarrassed.

This is a petty, small-minded, ignorant, back-water, inbred character assassination on your part.

Has anybody thought to ask what the guy did to deserve the punches?

LOL. You quite nicely represent the part of the post where I said:

While I'm sure we'll have some reflexive defenders from the usual suspects,
 
The Palin clan continues their Jerry Springer antics, this time beating up people at a party and generally trashing the place.

All of the Palins, including her divorced child, both highschool dropouts (or are there three now?) and apparently a couple of the out of wedlock kids, were all at a party and it turned ugly. Just like the traditional families we all strive to be in.

This half term governor/reality show failure/Ivanka Trump wannabee is sure showing us why a McCain/Palin vote would have been a disaster for the nation.



Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl - ABC News

While I'm sure we'll have some relexive defenders from the usual suspects, who do you think should be most aghast at this latest event?

Sarah Palin punched who? No one, she can't be expected to control every action of her children nor can she be held accountable.
The liberal media is determined to destroy Sarah Palin, but keeping her in the headlines puts money in her bank account.
 
Yet if it was Malia Obama beating the crap out of some guy at Fenway..,You might be interested.

The sitting president's daughter? Sure that would be news. The bolded part tells you why.
 


Let's see...

...Bristol Palin--a girl--throws six punches at a guy--allegedly a "male"-- and the whole family is guilty of "Jerry Springer antics"?

Really?

And then you attack her other kids when they've been accused--by your own source--of nothing!

But still you ask who should be embarrassed by all of this?

You should be embarrassed.

This is a petty, small-minded, ignorant, back-water, inbred character assassination on your part.

Has anybody thought to ask what the guy did to deserve the punches?

The intent of the article was to smear Republicans in an election season. I'd like to say this is desparate behavior but its actually par for the course from the left. The smear is an alternative to discussion, intended to "grant" some unearned moral superiority to the poo flinging initiator. All they needed out there was the headline-thats good enough-but I'd expect more from our "adversarial" media.
 
Back
Top Bottom