Other (please explain)
If the donor truly wants to help, and is not seeking attention, why even put the name on something that might be controversial?
If, when defending your support for Donald Trump, and your response is,
"But but but... HILLARY!!!", then you lost the argument before you even began.
I'm with Tres Borrachos on this one. IMO the charity did the right thing.
The Reddit community helped to spread the illegally obtained photos. There is no way to know if the individuals who contributed did, or did not, participate in such activities. However, anyone who did distribute such images, and the Reddit community itself, cannot whitewash its participation by donating to a charity.
Nor should any charity want to be associated with this episode. Charities do receive funds from the public, but that doesn't mean they should never apply any standards to donations.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
Singling out Reddit is foolish, they are not the sole source of the images nor did they help distribute any more than any other portion of the internet. To be consistent with this standard they should refuse all internet donations.