- Joined
- Jun 24, 2014
- Messages
- 8,868
- Reaction score
- 3,560
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
If its possible that warming can occur without humans and its possible that it can occur because of humans then how do you differentiate the two?
It seems to me the credibility of climate scientists took a serious hit when their models failed to predict that there hasn't been warming over the last several years. I think 14. If they were able to tie warming with CO2 or other human activity then why didn't their model work?
If the prescription for GW can't measure the impact on GW then why would we do anything? Plus, why would the US do anything when its India and China causing all the warming scientists say is occurring?
Too many questions, not enough answers. We shouldn't take action simply because it makes us feel better or we can tell our friends that we support the earth or whatever.
It seems to me the credibility of climate scientists took a serious hit when their models failed to predict that there hasn't been warming over the last several years. I think 14. If they were able to tie warming with CO2 or other human activity then why didn't their model work?
If the prescription for GW can't measure the impact on GW then why would we do anything? Plus, why would the US do anything when its India and China causing all the warming scientists say is occurring?
Too many questions, not enough answers. We shouldn't take action simply because it makes us feel better or we can tell our friends that we support the earth or whatever.