Just because you are I would not does not mean others should not.
Men who rent or pay for sex do so for many reasons. One of which is that some men have a very difficult time finding willing partners without paying for it. They might have terrible social skills or be very unattractive to many women. I see no reason why such men should not be permitted to rent sex from a consenting provider for money. After all why should only the PUAs be allowed to get laid?
Whats sickening about that?
I think it would be vastly superior to have a clean and legal trade as opposed to the 5 dollar drug addict hookup.
It's the oldest profession.
It quite literally gave birth to capitalism.
"Half full or half empty doesn't matter. What matters is, you've only got half a glass...so what are you going to do about it?" - Me
When prostituion is legalized the level of demand is expected to increase (the number of men willing to buy sex will increase since there's no longer any risk of being arrested) and the level of supply is also expected to increase (the number of women willing to sell sex will increase since there's no longer any risk of being arrested). If the demand increases by a larger amount than the supply increases, the disparity between the two will actually grow. And sex traffickers will have an even larger market share to fill with forced prostitution.
In light of that argument, I think Sweden's approach makes the most sense. In Sweden it's legal to sell sex (be a prostitute) but illegal to buy sex (be a john or to be a pimp). The idea is to try to minimize the disparity between the market demand and market supply. And, statistically, Sweden's approach has shown some success.
HumanTrafficking.org | News & Updates: Prostitution Ban Huge Success in Sweden