• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sams?

Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sams?

  • Agree

    Votes: 24 77.4%
  • disagree

    Votes: 7 22.6%

  • Total voters
    31
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

So? I don't think he has played a whole season. He is notoriously injury prone.

So what?

10 games with him at QB is a whole lot better than a full season of Michael Sam at DE.

It's really not even debatable.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

Because he sucks dick?

I don't have a problem with a team picking him late in the draft. It's the idea that if you DIDN'T pick him you're a bigot I have a problem with.

I never said that. You said he shouldn't have been drafted, and I think it wasn't a bad pick all things considered.

He won't be the first player who likes to suck dick anyway, he's just the first one that we know likes to do that.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

So what?

10 games with him at QB is a whole lot better than a full season of Michael Sam at DE.

It's really not even debatable.

I think they've got him as a LB, and he isn't going to start anyway. Probably never will, but if he can play special teams and rush the passer on 3rd down he'll be a nice role player.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

I never said that. You said he shouldn't have been drafted, and I think it wasn't a bad pick all things considered.

He won't be the first player who likes to suck dick anyway, he's just the first one that we know likes to do that.

That's because he shouldn't have been drafted.

Talent wise, he's one of the worst players drafted this year. You could potentially argue that he's good enough to be one of the last guys picked but the difference between him and whoever would have been picked next isn't enough to make up for the media firestorm he's causing. It was a dumb pick, especially by the Rams who have no place to even put him.

There only reason you're talking about him is because you like his sexuality.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

That's because he shouldn't have been drafted.

Talent wise, he's one of the worst players drafted this year. You could potentially argue that he's good enough to be one of the last guys picked but the difference between him and whoever would have been picked next isn't enough to make up for the media firestorm he's causing. It was a dumb pick, especially by the Rams who have no place to even put him.

There only reason you're talking about him is because you like his sexuality.

I have no feelings about his sexuality one way or the other. A team from St. Louis drafted a guy from Missouri - I don't know for sure, but I'd bet there's a fair number of football fans in St. Louis who went to the University of Missouri. As a role player and a possible box office draw, I don't think it's a bad pick.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

Which makes a difference how in the way they behave while in the locker room when no one is in there?

Pretty much the same argument was made by those against repealing DADT "but the straight men will have to share the locker rooms with gay men". So what? It doesn't matter. The public knows that the military straight men are sharing locker rooms with gay men. And since the repeal of DADT, several gay men and women in the service have openly revealed their sexuality on TV, to reporters, in public.
I have to say that last part I disagree with. Don't get me wrong I have no issues serving with openly gay dudes but active duty military talking to reporters about topics such as that. There job is to serve the country not take sides in political or cultural issues. I have the exact same feeling towards any active service member that would talk to reporters about not wanting to serve with gays. Service members should not be using their service to push any type of agenda.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

Using the "distraction" excuse is cowardly and not at all believable. NFL needs to man up about this. You know what else is distraction? Having a dog killer on your team, rapists, Ray Lewis, bigots like Dungee. It's obvious that teams avoided drafting Sam out of prejudice. They might want to keep in mind that in many of these cities, such discrimination is illegal. That it's a 'draft' makes no difference. It's still employment.


you may be sorely disappointed when he doesnt make the 53 man squad

i give him a 30% chance to hang on

the issue isnt about discrimination....its about talent

he went from a projected 3-4th rounder, all the way to the 7th because his numbers didnt stack up

he is too small for an NFL defensive end....and too slow for an outside linebacker

now maybe those times and his performance at the combines was an aberration....he played much better than those last year in the SEC

but if those numbers are reality, he will have a hard time making the transition to the pros.....and it wont have crap to do with his sexual orientation
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

I can tell you as a straight man I would be uncomfortable dressing and showering with someone I knew was gay.

Why Navy. If in your view, homosexuality does not REALLY exist. Your view has always been that all men are really straight and that homosexuality is just a choice that some misguided people choose. In which case, all gays are really straight, so why would you have an issue showering with them?

Navy Pride said:
I am not a homophobe

uh......your endless posts betray you yet again my Republican friend.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

I have to say that last part I disagree with. Don't get me wrong I have no issues serving with openly gay dudes but active duty military talking to reporters about topics such as that. There job is to serve the country not take sides in political or cultural issues. I have the exact same feeling towards any active service member that would talk to reporters about not wanting to serve with gays. Service members should not be using their service to push any type of agenda.

We still get to live our lives and do things. Being gay isn't an "agenda", that is just it. It is simply being who you are. Just like I can pose with my husband while either or both of us are in uniform for press (usually not on purpose) especially if either of us are coming home from a deployment, so should gays be able to do that, and now they can. I hugged my husband (at the time my fiance) as he got off the plane coming home from Iraq with an M16 still strapped to his back, as did dozens of other wives and girlfriends. But there weren't any boyfriends there because at the time DADT was still in effect. Many times when a ship comes home from deployment, her homecoming is televised on at least local stations. There is no reason that same sex couples should not be allowed to do the same thing in front of those cameras that straight couples do when we get home from such things. That is part of life.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

It's funny because Michael Sam brushed it off and is okay with Dungy, and Dungy is okay with Michael Sam. The only people bitching about it seem to be people that aren't involved at all.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

We still get to live our lives and do things. Being gay isn't an "agenda", that is just it. It is simply being who you are. Just like I can pose with my husband while either or both of us are in uniform for press (usually not on purpose) especially if either of us are coming home from a deployment, so should gays be able to do that, and now they can. I hugged my husband (at the time my fiance) as he got off the plane coming home from Iraq with an M16 still strapped to his back, as did dozens of other wives and girlfriends. But there weren't any boyfriends there because at the time DADT was still in effect. Many times when a ship comes home from deployment, her homecoming is televised on at least local stations. There is no reason that same sex couples should not be allowed to do the same thing in front of those cameras that straight couples do when we get home from such things. That is part of life.
I probably was not very clear with my post. I have no issues with anything you typed. Gays should have every single right and freedom that straights do. The way I took the the last part about coming out to reporters is making a political stand. Now if they are just kissing and a reporter happens to get a pic of that who cares. No issues. But seeking out a reporter to bring attention to you being gay is making political and social stand and shouldn't be done in uniform. The military in my opinion is not the place for that.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

I have to say that last part I disagree with. Don't get me wrong I have no issues serving with openly gay dudes but active duty military talking to reporters about topics such as that. There job is to serve the country not take sides in political or cultural issues. I have the exact same feeling towards any active service member that would talk to reporters about not wanting to serve with gays. Service members should not be using their service to push any type of agenda.

Its not politically correct for military personnel to speak out about gays serving openly.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

you may be sorely disappointed when he doesnt make the 53 man squad

i give him a 30% chance to hang on

the issue isnt about discrimination....its about talent

he went from a projected 3-4th rounder, all the way to the 7th because his numbers didnt stack up

he is too small for an NFL defensive end....and too slow for an outside linebacker

now maybe those times and his performance at the combines was an aberration....he played much better than those last year in the SEC

but if those numbers are reality, he will have a hard time making the transition to the pros.....and it wont have crap to do with his sexual orientation

I predict he won't make the 53 man roster and the leftist media to stir **** up will say it was because he was gay.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

so much for free speech in America.....

****....we've been reduced to "Free Speech Zones" in this country. Government loves its power. I know that's not 100% applicable here, but free speech in America, in general, is dead.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

If by self serving you mean giving the team the best chance to win, then that's how a GM should operate. Other players' distractions are tolerated because they're good enough that their talent outweighs it. With Sam you can get a player of roughly equal talent at that point in the 7th. I wouldn't take the risk on the player who might hurt the team when I can get an equal player who won't.

Really, SEC defensive player of the year? He was projected 3rd-4th round before coming out. Granted, the draft is largely a crapshot from start to finish (Lions had a couple #3 picks go bust i recall), but you'll have a real hard time convincing me that not a single team would take him or that there's any risk compared to taking a Manti Te'o closet case who invents girlfriends and kills them off just to escape the pressure. It's harder on Sam than any of his teammates, so they can cry me a river.

And talk of distractions, how about the first black coach in the super bowl? The media went on about Dungee himself. Guess he should've been fired then. Gipper mentioned the Giants' hire of a renowned gay basher, and that's no distraction? It's not only because most the NFL prefers gay bashers. Whose fault is that, Sam's? The media? I will tell you, only the NFL is to blame.

In the end, Sam and, to a lesser extent, the Rams coach and GM will be the ones remembered. Tell me without looking it up who won the world series any year that Jackie Robinson played. The Giants or Green Bay can go win the super bowl because they don't have a 'distraction' and they'll still only be remembered for their hate.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

you may be sorely disappointed when he doesnt make the 53 man squad

i give him a 30% chance to hang on

the issue isnt about discrimination....its about talent

he went from a projected 3-4th rounder, all the way to the 7th because his numbers didnt stack up

he is too small for an NFL defensive end....and too slow for an outside linebacker

now maybe those times and his performance at the combines was an aberration....he played much better than those last year in the SEC

but if those numbers are reality, he will have a hard time making the transition to the pros.....and it wont have crap to do with his sexual orientation

If he doesn't then so be it, but it won't be only 7th rounders who are cut. When coaches and players are openly bashing Sam even the day he was drafted, and he's the *only* openly gay players ever in the NFL, you won't convince me it's not about discrimination as well.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

Really, SEC defensive player of the year? He was projected 3rd-4th round before coming out.

And he still was after coming out, until 2 weeks later where he had a disastrous combine. Those type of athletic tests generally count for more than college results in the NFL draft. It's why you see college record setters like Jordan Lynch not even get drafted.

Granted, the draft is largely a crapshot from start to finish (Lions had a couple #3 picks go bust i recall), but you'll have a real hard time convincing me that not a single team would take him or that there's any risk compared to taking a Manti Te'o closet case who invents girlfriends and kills them off just to escape the pressure. It's harder on Sam than any of his teammates, so they can cry me a river.

He's not much more if any of a distraction than Manti Te'o. Te'o was a 1st round talent who got bumped to the 2nd because of the same type of problems with media exposure. Still he was obviously good enough that it didn't hurt his stock all that much.

And talk of distractions, how about the first black coach in the super bowl? The media went on about Dungee himself. Guess he should've been fired then.

He obviously shouldn't have because Dungy was an excellent coach. When you are a good player/coach/whatever the potential for distraction hardly matters. When there are tons of other players with about equal talent to yours that can be picked in the same place, the potential for distraction becomes the type of thing that could push others over the top.

Gipper mentioned the Giants' hire of a renowned gay basher, and that's no distraction?

Nobody's writing front page articles about David Tyree right now. I don't see the distraction there.

It's not only because most the NFL prefers gay bashers. Whose fault is that, Sam's? The media? I will tell you, only the NFL is to blame.
\

I'd say its probably the media's fault for making such a gigantic deal out of it. Luckily it really only matters for the first one. The next openly gay players in the NFL won't have the same distraction potential.

In the end, Sam and, to a lesser extent, the Rams coach and GM will be the ones remembered.

Maybe. If he's good enough they will. Jackie Robinson was more than just the first black baseball player. He was a six time allstar, an MVP, and helped take his team to the World Series in his first year. He's a deserving Hall of Famer. Does history remember Earl Lloyd, Nat Clifton, or Chuck Cooper, the first three black NBA players? Not really. The first black player people remember is Wilt Chamberlain, because he's one of the all time greats.

Tell me without looking it up who won the world series any year that Jackie Robinson played.

I could name a few, but how bout his debut year 1947 where the Yankees beat Robinson's Dodgers. In one of the games Cookie something, (forget his last name), broke up a no-hitter in the 9th with two outs to win the game.

The Giants or Green Bay can go win the super bowl because they don't have a 'distraction' and they'll still only be remembered for their hate.

I think they'll probably be remembered for winning the Super Bowl.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

you may be sorely disappointed when he doesnt make the 53 man squad

i give him a 30% chance to hang on

the issue isnt about discrimination....its about talent

he went from a projected 3-4th rounder, all the way to the 7th because his numbers didnt stack up

he is too small for an NFL defensive end....and too slow for an outside linebacker

now maybe those times and his performance at the combines was an aberration....he played much better than those last year in the SEC

but if those numbers are reality, he will have a hard time making the transition to the pros.....and it wont have crap to do with his sexual orientation

Sorry but i have to add as well now that i recall it, some draft predictions immediately dropped Sam after he came out, before the combine. CBS dropped him *70 spots* the next day for example. Poor combine usually means 1 round drop or so. Suddenly they notice his size and conclude he's not nfl caliber?

SI.com anonymous poll of coaches, *8* admitted they expect him to fall in the draft, "they project a significant drop in Sam's draft stock, a publicity circus and an NFL locker room culture not prepared to deal with an openly gay player.....All the NFL personnel members interviewed believed that Sam's announcement will cause him to drop in the draft. He was projected between the third and seventh rounds prior to the announcement."

This was all *before* the combine! Revisionism like yours in attempt to veil widespread bigotry is what makes me sorely disappointed.

Another for the 'distraction' crowd: Ravens RB Ray Rice suspended two games for assault charge - CBSSports.com
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

And he still was after coming out, until 2 weeks later where he had a disastrous combine. Those type of athletic tests generally count for more than college results in the NFL draft. It's why you see college record setters like Jordan Lynch not even get drafted.

Nope (and sorry to others to have to repeat myself) - CBS dropped him 70 spots the next day and then there was the SI poll of current coaches : *8* admitted they expect him to fall in the draft, "they project a significant drop in Sam's draft stock, a publicity circus and an NFL locker room culture not prepared to deal with an openly gay player.....All the NFL personnel members interviewed believed that Sam's announcement will cause him to drop in the draft. He was projected between the third and seventh rounds prior to the announcement."

Another whopper: ""I don't think football is ready for [an openly gay player] just yet," said an NFL player personnel assistant. "In the coming decade or two, it's going to be acceptable, but at this point in time it's still a man's-man game. To call somebody a [gay slur] is still so commonplace. It'd chemically imbalance an NFL locker room and meeting room."

Now if the Rams can handle it, good for them for being the exception, i applaud them fully for living in 21st century.

He's not much more if any of a distraction than Manti Te'o. Te'o was a 1st round talent who got bumped to the 2nd because of the same type of problems with media exposure. Still he was obviously good enough that it didn't hurt his stock all that much.

Te'o never came out, that's my point. He obviously feared he wouldn't get drafted. He kept denying the obvious even after the dead girlfriend was discovered to be fake. All it did was lead GMs to ask at rookie interviews "do you like girls?" Do you need more evidence the NFL is deeply homophobic? I can go pull up quotes from any player who came out after leaving.

He obviously shouldn't have because Dungy was an excellent coach. When you are a good player/coach/whatever the potential for distraction hardly matters. When there are tons of other players with about equal talent to yours that can be picked in the same place, the potential for distraction becomes the type of thing that could push others over the top.

And that is completely wrong and it says a lot about you to not see that. "Win at all cost" mentality won't ever win me over. If they all have "equal talent" then why don't the GMs just toss a coin and let that run the 3rd-7th picks for em.


I'd say its probably the media's fault for making such a gigantic deal out of it. Luckily it really only matters for the first one. The next openly gay players in the NFL won't have the same distraction potential.

Why would it change minds on *other* teams? You're right it would eliminate that *excuse* and prove that a team can function with a gay player. It wouldn't make the bigotry disappear though, cause it has little to do with football. There's indications the rookies entering the league now are more tolerant. Like we saw with the general population, it'll take 5-7 years for the old guard to die off to see real change.

Maybe. If he's good enough they will. Jackie Robinson was more than just the first black baseball player. He was a six time allstar, an MVP, and helped take his team to the World Series in his first year. He's a deserving Hall of Famer. Does history remember Earl Lloyd, Nat Clifton, or Chuck Cooper, the first three black NBA players? Not really. The first black player people remember is Wilt Chamberlain, because he's one of the all time greats.

Partly yeah. The real consideration is, was there much opposition to them joining NBA? Did they have a senator trying to ban black players? Was there media circus or open hatred of this sort? Also, Cooper was the 1st drafted, Clifton signed the contract 1st, and Lloyd played first. Who do you celebrate then? People easily get confused and lose interest by this. If 3 enter at the same time, i'm guessing they did not face the same adversity as Jackie did or Sam might. There was opportunity. People forget it because not much happened.

``I didn't have the race-biting and the heat all on my shoulders like Jackie Robinson,'' Cooper said before he died of cancer in 1984 at the age of 57. ``Besides, any black coming after Jackie, in any sport, had it easy compared to the turmoil he lived through.''

They remember Wilt cause he was phenomenal but i never heard anyone say he was the first
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

I agree with him but for what it is worth, I wouldnt have taken Johnny Manziel for the same reasons.
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

Nope (and sorry to others to have to repeat myself) - CBS dropped him 70 spots the next day and then there was the SI poll of current coaches : *8* admitted they expect him to fall in the draft, "they project a significant drop in Sam's draft stock, a publicity circus and an NFL locker room culture not prepared to deal with an openly gay player.....All the NFL personnel members interviewed believed that Sam's announcement will cause him to drop in the draft. He was projected between the third and seventh rounds prior to the announcement."

Another whopper: ""I don't think football is ready for [an openly gay player] just yet," said an NFL player personnel assistant. "In the coming decade or two, it's going to be acceptable, but at this point in time it's still a man's-man game. To call somebody a [gay slur] is still so commonplace. It'd chemically imbalance an NFL locker room and meeting room."

Now if the Rams can handle it, good for them for being the exception, i applaud them fully for living in 21st century.



Te'o never came out, that's my point. He obviously feared he wouldn't get drafted. He kept denying the obvious even after the dead girlfriend was discovered to be fake. All it did was lead GMs to ask at rookie interviews "do you like girls?" Do you need more evidence the NFL is deeply homophobic? I can go pull up quotes from any player who came out after leaving.



And that is completely wrong and it says a lot about you to not see that. "Win at all cost" mentality won't ever win me over. If they all have "equal talent" then why don't the GMs just toss a coin and let that run the 3rd-7th picks for em.




Why would it change minds on *other* teams? You're right it would eliminate that *excuse* and prove that a team can function with a gay player. It wouldn't make the bigotry disappear though, cause it has little to do with football. There's indications the rookies entering the league now are more tolerant. Like we saw with the general population, it'll take 5-7 years for the old guard to die off to see real change.



Partly yeah. The real consideration is, was there much opposition to them joining NBA? Did they have a senator trying to ban black players? Was there media circus or open hatred of this sort? Also, Cooper was the 1st drafted, Clifton signed the contract 1st, and Lloyd played first. Who do you celebrate then? People easily get confused and lose interest by this. If 3 enter at the same time, i'm guessing they did not face the same adversity as Jackie did or Sam might. There was opportunity. People forget it because not much happened.

``I didn't have the race-biting and the heat all on my shoulders like Jackie Robinson,'' Cooper said before he died of cancer in 1984 at the age of 57. ``Besides, any black coming after Jackie, in any sport, had it easy compared to the turmoil he lived through.''

They remember Wilt cause he was phenomenal but i never heard anyone say he was the first


it doesnt matter what cbs sports thinks

it doesnt matter what SI thinks or wrote

all that matters is 32 draft rooms, and the general managers running them

you think they listen to media reports? really?

every pro team has a scouting department....consists of at least 6-8 guys....or more

they watch tape, interview players and coaches, and try to determine whether or not a player can fit into their scheme...be it offensive or defensive

they rank hundreds of players......and assign them a number of where they feel that players value falls compared to every other player in the draft pool

someone using the SI report to grade a guy is out looking for a new job shortly thereafter

it is a high risk/high reward job.....finding the diamonds in the rough is what these guys get paid for

it is fairly easy to spot a #1 #1 type player.....not so easy to figure out the 6th or 7th rounder that has the ability to stick with a team

dont read too much into the "media" crap

if Michael Sam is good enough, he will get a shot

and as i said before, i think his chance is 3/10 of making it
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

Really, SEC defensive player of the year? He was projected 3rd-4th round before coming out. Granted, the draft is largely a crapshot from start to finish (Lions had a couple #3 picks go bust i recall), but you'll have a real hard time convincing me that not a single team would take him or that there's any risk compared to taking a Manti Te'o closet case who invents girlfriends and kills them off just to escape the pressure. It's harder on Sam than any of his teammates, so they can cry me a river.

And talk of distractions, how about the first black coach in the super bowl? The media went on about Dungee himself. Guess he should've been fired then. Gipper mentioned the Giants' hire of a renowned gay basher, and that's no distraction? It's not only because most the NFL prefers gay bashers. Whose fault is that, Sam's? The media? I will tell you, only the NFL is to blame.

In the end, Sam and, to a lesser extent, the Rams coach and GM will be the ones remembered. Tell me without looking it up who won the world series any year that Jackie Robinson played. The Giants or Green Bay can go win the super bowl because they don't have a 'distraction' and they'll still only be remembered for their hate.

some team did take him....the rams

but you are convinced that if he doesnt make it, it is because he is gay

google Dre Kirkpatrick....or Terrence Cody....or Jamarcus Russell....or Johnathan Sullivan (georgia bulldog)

all were great sec palyers

all were busts in the nfl

sometimes talent from the collegiate level doesnt translate to talent on the pro level

just saying....
 
Re: Do you agree or disagree with Tony Dungys's comments about gay player Michael Sam

The only thing worth hearing from Tony Dungy is an apology to Michael Sam


'If Tony Dungy, who occasionally acts like the self-appointed conscience of American sports, doesn’t stop explaining what he meant about Michael Sam being a distraction and stop being this kind of public nuisance himself, he will eventually have to worry more about keeping his job on television than Sam earning his own job with the Rams.

Whatever Dungy says about Sam and a controversy that he created, it is impossible to evaluate why he wouldn’t have wanted Sam on a football team he was coaching without putting all of this into the context of Dungy’s religious beliefs. That means his interpretation of the Bible, and an opposition to same-sex marriage that he’s decided is God’s will, as do all the other people who are as intolerant about the rights of gays as Dungy clearly is.

We are told constantly, by the way, how clear God is on how marriage is between a man and a woman, and how strict scripture is on this subject. But you wonder how Dungy, who once criticized President Obama for his stance on gay marriage in this country, feels about this Old Testament passage about slavery:

“If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing.” If we’re being as literal here as we are about homosexuality, apparently slavery is good for six years, not so good after that.

Dungy, who is treated more and more like some coaching giant the further he gets from his career, is entitled to his opinions, about Michael Sam, about same-sex marriage, about the Bible. He is entitled to past opinions about Michael Vick, for whom he did everything except act as a pulling guard when Vick was making a comeback after being part of a ring that killed and tortured dogs and sent him to prison. But anybody who thinks Sam, openly gay football player, is a “distraction” but that Vick wasn’t when he returned to the NFL with the Eagles, is simply a point-misser. Or carrying Dungy’s coat. Or just trying to be different.

If Dungy himself believes that he can somehow get by saying that Sam is a distraction and that Vick was not, he is disingenuous at best and probably a hypocrite. He needs to stop talking about this now, and explaining himself, because what he is not doing is helping himself for one minute.'

The only thing worth hearing from Tony Dungy is an apology to Michael Sam - NY Daily News
 
Back
Top Bottom