Well it was rocket88's point so he should probably define the term.
Originally Posted by Unitedwestand13
But his point was made in response to my suggested campaign rules:
How about we change the rules of the game then and have both sides spend say six months before the election not repeating a single lie about any candidate, not spreading any unsupported rumors, not telling a single untruth about any candidate,, and not personally insulting any candidate or any person supporting a candidate. Discussions must focus on the truthful analysis of the demonstrated character, accomplishments, qualifications, and track record of the candidate. If that had been the case with Barack Obama vs Mitt Romney, who would have won the 2012 election? For that matter, who would have won the 2008 nominations? The 2012 nominations?