View Poll Results: Does it make sense for Romney t run again?

Voters
125. You may not vote on this poll
  • Absoutely. He's by far the best shot the RNC has.

    23 18.40%
  • He might be good if he can shake the 47% remark he made.

    2 1.60%
  • I really don't care who the RNC puts up at this point

    10 8.00%
  • The guy is DOA. Find some new blood.

    57 45.60%
  • History suggests that he should not run again.

    33 26.40%
Page 21 of 53 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 526

Thread: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

  1. #201
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,803

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Oh now it's the "reading comprehension" card from Vance.
    Trying to backstep from calling someone stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    You have a reading comprehension problem?
    I said I didn't believe you could POSSIBLY be that stupid. Am I wrong?
    No you didn't--you never said the word possibly--you know what word GOPs use for lying don't you? Lying.

    Never mind...your diversion pretty clearly answers the question.
    And Vance finishes with the "diversion" card .
    Physics is Phun

  2. #202
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,677

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    Oh now it's the "reading comprehension" card from Vance.
    Trying to backstep from calling someone stupid.


    No you didn't--you never said the word possibly--you know what word GOPs use for lying don't you? Lying.


    And Vance finishes with the "diversion" card .
    dood...you are intentionally working on proving me wrong.

    Direct question. Are you so stupid as to believe democrats are and historically have been any less capable and eager to shelter their wealth?

  3. #203
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,803

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    McConnell, Hatch, Cochran, McCain--just for starters--your turn--
    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    I think the best solution is to get rid of the lucrative pensions for those parasites.
    that would keep them from being in office for Bidenesque number of years.

    the Clintons and the Obamas
    Clintons and Obamas are decades away from the GOP octa- septa- generaryans.
    But nary a word about them being term-limted.
    We do get your hypocritical untruthfulness here dude .
    Physics is Phun

  4. #204
    The Dude
    Kobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Western NY
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    42,890

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Quote Originally Posted by tres borrachos View Post
    Interesting. Grant responded to my post pointing out how ignorant the personal attacks on Mitt Romney's wife were. He posted this:

    This is what good people are up against these days. The Romney's don't even have a blemish on their past. No drug use, no consorting with terrorists, no God Damn America, no political crony capitalism, but they are the ones who are always under personal attacks. Nothing to do with policies, it's just personal.


    I missed the mention of liberals being the only ones who engage in personal attacks.

    You countered with something about the "poor persecuted Republicans".

    I would think your post wasn't partisan except for the fact it read as a counter partisan attack on Grant's post, which was in response to my post about Ann Romney. No mention of political parties from me, or Grant.
    I was responding to Grant, not you, and it's simply his general M.O. But I'll "grant" (ha ha) that this time, he didn't explicitly state just liberals did this. This time.
    Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.

  5. #205
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,803

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    Direct question.
    You had your chance to be normal Vance--but you chose to be yourself.
    Are you so stupid
    Thank you for removing all doubt for another evening .
    Physics is Phun

  6. #206
    Sage
    RDS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Last Seen
    10-10-17 @ 05:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    5,398

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    You mean docked next to John Kerry's yacht?
    He will be chilling on his yacht during a crisis.

  7. #207
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,677

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    You had your chance to be normal Vance--but you chose to be yourself.

    Thank you for removing all doubt for another evening .
    It's completely telling that you continue to refuse to answer a very direct question. Speaks very clearly.

  8. #208
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,677

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Quote Originally Posted by RDS View Post
    He will be chilling on his yacht during a crisis.
    With satellite and cellphones...meh...could be pretty sweet.

  9. #209
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    07-08-14 @ 06:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,325

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Taken from the article:

    "When was the last time the word ‘success” was used in Washington?

    Henry writes, "Call Mitt Romney what you will, but his core competence is just that: competence. Unlike career politicians who tend to rise or fall on the level of their oratory, Mitt is, at his core, a chief executive"

    He continues, "No doubt Mitt is more comfortable tackling complex problems and analyzing data than kissing babies or yucking it up on a rope line. But maybe that's what America needs in 2016, and given the multitude of today's challenges, maybe the Quinnipiac poll reflects the growing view that it's what we needed all along."

    Romney is a man who will not be easily dismissed after the last six years of White House stumbles and outright failure. Polls show that 33 percent of registered voters think Barack Obama is the worst president since World War II. Forty-five percent said the United States would have been better off if Romney had defeated Obama's re-election bid in 2012".


    The more I think and read about it, the more it makes sense for Romney to run.

  10. #210
    #NeverTrump
    a351's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Space Coast
    Last Seen
    09-09-17 @ 08:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    6,902

    Re: Mitt Romney in 2016: Yes, or No?

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    You didn't read your own source, did you?
    Why yes I did, including the portion which explicitly states that Unemployment Insurance is not used to calculate the unemployment rate as a whole, or whether or not and individual is categorically unemployed. Is it that hard to do 2 to 3 minutes worth of reading before commenting on the subject authoritatively?

Page 21 of 53 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •