• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in future?

Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in future?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4

Ryan5

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
483
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in future?
 
Last edited:
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Regardless of if they grow up to be Democrat or Republican, it's wrong to kill them via abortion. A lack or abundance of birth control doesn't make abortion any less of a barbaric intrusion of human rights.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Regardless of if they grow up to be Democrat or Republican, it's wrong to kill them via abortion. A lack or abundance of birth control doesn't make abortion any less of a barbaric intrusion of human rights.


That's a very loaded statement.

Nobody's arguing to "kill" anybody.. :roll::roll::roll:
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

That's a very loaded statement.

Nobody's arguing to "kill" anybody.. :roll::roll::roll:
Except, of course, the pro-abortion lobby and its supporters
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Except, of course, the pro-abortion lobby and its supporters

Well. Only Post #4 and already we've devolved into the depths.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

I support the criminalization of abortion and a constitutional amendment to protect the right to life of the unborn. I would argue that, on moral grounds, protecting the right to life of the innocent is a greater obligation than the protection of virtually any other right for any other citizen. However, there is no need to strain a gnat just to swallow a camel.

Pragmatism may add emphasis to politics here. The fact is that another fifty million of Generation Y'ers and Millennials would simply increase the rate at which the culture war is being lost in this country by traditionalists. We would have millions more clamoring for big government, draining the federal coffers at an even greater rate and accelerating our descent into the economic and intellectual abyss of socialism. We would feature that many more undisciplined, uneducated, immoderate heathens demanding their seat at the table that the America we once knew would vanish quicker than it already is.

Given that the kinds of people most likely to have abortions are exactly the kinds of people America really shouldn't want being responsible for the raising of children, as much of a crime against humanity as abortion is, perhaps God has allowed this to take place in order to spare these millions of innocents the tragedy of being brought up in a godless society on the fast track to hell? As much as they deserve the chance to live on this earth, perhaps they've lucked out by avoiding it while under government of the ungodly?
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Well. Only Post #4 and already we've devolved into the depths.
Webster's first defition for "kill" is "to deprive of life" or "to cause the death of". Is there a more appropriate word for the abortion an unborn child?
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Point is simply that two generations of legalized abortion probably has resulted in fewer liberals than there would be otherwise. I hesitate to call it a "silver lining" but it the shoe fits...
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Webster's first defition for "kill" is "to deprive of life" or "to cause the death of". Is there a more appropriate word for the abortion an unborn child?

Killing an unborn child isn't what 99% of abortions do.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Killing an unborn child isn't what 99% of abortions do.
Your definition of "unborn child" must differ radically from mine then.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

God, I hope not. The idea of our bull**** two-party-only system lasting another twenty years is a horrifying thought. One can only pray the next generation has a better choice than "would you like to be punched in the face or kicked in the balls?"
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Obviously.
As you see it, at what point does a fetus become a baby?
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in future?


Nobody thinks that far into the future.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Thread is quickly degenerating into a an abortion debate. I think I'll unsubscribe.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Your definition of "unborn child" must differ radically from mine then.

you have to remember that the liberal left and those that support abortion don't consider a fetus an unborn baby. they dehumanize the child so that they can live with a clear conscience of what they are doing and to help the mother cope easier with her decision.

i don't see how you can live with a clear conscience.
I have seen every one of our kids sonograms. there is a kid in there it isn't some goo as sarah silverman said. there is a living breathing child.

the dehumanization of people in order to kill them has been around forever. 1.06m kids were killed by abortion in 2011.
instead of practicing safe sex or not having sex at all.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

As you see it, at what point does a fetus become a baby?

Well, since I don't believe in killing babies, I'd say four months. I wish abortions were limited by that. It's arbitrary. It's not scientifically correct. But that's what my heart tells me.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

I support unrestricted abortions up to the age of 18. Basically mitigates many concerns about getting birth control.

Bill Cosby: "I brought you into this world and I can take you out."
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Webster's first defition for "kill" is "to deprive of life" or "to cause the death of". Is there a more appropriate word for the abortion an unborn child?

The correct term is foeticide. Words have meaning. Abortion is lawful foeticide.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Well, since I don't believe in killing babies, I'd say four months. I wish abortions were limited by that. It's arbitrary. It's not scientifically correct. But that's what my heart tells me.
Understood and I appreciate your honest about the arbitrariness of the cut-off line. I hope you can understand why someone who believes human life begins earlier would look at it differently. I have to say, however, that limiting abortion to a four-month window would be substantially easier to "live with" than the current tangle. One thing I certainly oppose is a 5-4 majority of unelected judges making that arbitrary decision, rather than having such a line drawn by a deliberative body of duly elected representatives (i.e. a legislature). IIRC when Roe v. Wade was decided, abortion was only legal in 5 of the 50 states.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Understood and I appreciate your honest about the arbitrariness of the cut-off line. I hope you can understand why someone who believes human life begins earlier would look at it differently. I have to say, however, that limiting abortion to a four-month window would be substantially easier to "live with" than the current tangle. One thing I certainly oppose is a 5-4 majority of unelected judges making that arbitrary decision, rather than having such a line drawn by a deliberative body of duly elected representatives (i.e. a legislature). IIRC when Roe v. Wade was decided, abortion was only legal in 5 of the 50 states.

I absolutely DO understand.
 
Re: Does less birth control pill availability/coverage = more Democrat voters in futu

Understood and I appreciate your honest about the arbitrariness of the cut-off line. I hope you can understand why someone who believes human life begins earlier would look at it differently. I have to say, however, that limiting abortion to a four-month window would be substantially easier to "live with" than the current tangle. One thing I certainly oppose is a 5-4 majority of unelected judges making that arbitrary decision, rather than having such a line drawn by a deliberative body of duly elected representatives (i.e. a legislature). IIRC when Roe v. Wade was decided, abortion was only legal in 5 of the 50 states.

Just from both of your posts I hope you can see why "choice" is the most practical and moral way to legally handle abortion. Because no one can agree on almost anything in the discussion and much of it is arbitrary. You cannot force others to believe what you do.

What is immoral is the force and gross infringements on the rights of individual women if choice were taken away from them.
 
Back
Top Bottom