- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
that is really stupid. Its like saying people who are not professional fire fighters cannot have the same fire extinguishers pros use but they can own some fire extinguishers
if you can claim cops are more likely to be attacked by multiple assailants at the same time as other civilians perhaps you can make a somewhat cogent argument that non LEO civilians can get by with less rounds. But you cannot. In fact, citizens who are not uniformed cops are far more likely to be attacked by multiple assailants than civilian LEOs
I fully agree that the fire extinguisher argument is "really stupid" - to quote you - as it has nothing to do with the Second Amendment or police officers and their jobs.
I decline to take a swing at your own created strawman with the scrawled sign "multiple assailants" pinned to its chest as it is irrelevant and was never my argument.