I support some aspects, but not all. I think overall it does harm and it should be repealed and replaced.
Pretty much the way I feel about it too. :thumbs:I will support it until something better comes along. At which point I will be the first person to say **** this piece of ****, out with the old in with the new...
I support it because its better than what we had, covers more people, and forces the insurance companies to do the right thing.
I support some aspects, but not all. I think overall it does harm and it should be repealed and replaced.
No, it is yet another massive federal entitlement program based on income redistribution and crony capitalism. It was only considered constitutional because one lame SCOTUS justice decided that the federal gov't can do anything if they simply relate it to the tax code.
I support it hopefully; it is a timid step on the way to Unversed Healthcare.:2wave:
Not even close...
It is a step in the opposite direction, placing more profits and more control in the hands of insurance companies.
Universal health care cannot function in a for-profit model. Not one universal model has a large for-profit aspect, the best have none at all.
France, Germany, Norway, Canada, the pioneers have all removed profit from the equation.
It will never happen in America....at least not in my lifetime. The failures and disruptions caused by this pig will drive back that impetus and rightfully so. So bad is this law that no American should trust his government on the issue again for a decade. You had the world's best health care economists standing right next door offereing to advise. Obama ignored them. Those Canadian economists said 15 million people would have to change plans or lose them, and Obama said "if you like your plan....."
Those same economists also projected what will happen three, five, ten years from now when the mandates kick in, when the ER waiting rooms get closed by the fire marshal, that this way is your Gotterdamerung, Obama went on saying "if you like your plan" because the picture they painted, which hjas been 100 % accurate so far, is really, really ugly.
And moving to an even more, gasp, "socialist" model will not be on, the people are not going to believe it will be less costly than the rusted out, engineless and broken Edsel at Cadillac prices they are already paying for.
Obama set your tragectory back by at least ten years, maybe fifty..the smell of this garbage is going to linger a long, long time.
I don't support the ACA, but I think attempting to repeal it is a huge waste of time. We should put our efforts into fixing the glaring problems instead of partisan rabble-rousing.
You cannot polish a turd. There is no way to “fix” this disastrous piece of sh^H^Hlegislation that doesn't begin with completely repealing it, and removing from office as many as possible of the idiots who are responsible for inflicting it on us in the first place.
I don't support the ACA, but I think attempting to repeal it is a huge waste of time. We should put our efforts into fixing the glaring problems instead of partisan rabble-rousing.
Income redistribution to whom? Insurance company execs?