Sababa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2014
- Messages
- 2,578
- Reaction score
- 1,089
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I wonder how this would play out if Mr. Sterling was under fire for expressing an opinion that is controversial, but on a side that those on the far-wrong tend to favor, such as supporting “gay marriage” or drug legalization.
In neither of those cases do we see an attack on people and nor do I think that it would hurt the brand as much as what he did say, so your point is just not at all relevant. You are comparing dynamite and cream cheese.
.I rather suspect that the very same people who are defending the efforts to punish him for expressing the opinion that he did would be his staunchest defenders if that was the case
that may be true for some, but in the end the issue is about hurting the league and the right for the league to drum him out. So the question is what opinion would be so uncomfortable for a majority of the people to have a bad reaction to the point it would hurt the league? I can think of a scenario? Help me out.
The far wrong is all for free thought and free speech, as long as you only use it for thoughts and speech with which they agree.
I know you think that is clever but it is an insane statement.
Now I must address your signature:
The five great lies of the Left Wrong:
Again your attempt to be clever makes you sound like a sheep of the right wing noise machine.
We can be Godless and free.
Well you can but most liberals don't believe this as many of us are religious.
• “Social justice” through forced redistribution of wealth. •
What do you even mean>
Silencing religious opinions counts as “diversity”.
Again most liberals are religious. Oh you seem to be talking about being critical of bigotry disguised as religion. I guess you are defending hate.
• Freedom without moral and personal responsibility.
Most liberals have a morality and take responsibility. The failure of the right is to be comfortable with the notion that others might see what is moral differently from them.
•
Civilization can survive the intentional undermining of the family.
Liberals aren't intentionally undermining the family, that is a lie. But that said isn't it the right blocking people who love each other from formalizing their love through marriage and creating strong families?