Stirling (racist comments)
Vick (dog abuser/fighter/killer/torturer)
Does anyone have the decency to know what they are talking about before they speak anymore?
I'm not merely basing my assessment on his PREJUDICE. It's his actual racist behaviors.
Edited to add: Also, nobody is ENTITLED to have an opinion without having it called hypocritical or stupid. That's some ****ing stupid nonsense right there.
If someone has a hypocritical or stupid opinion, then they DESERVE to have that stupid hypocritical opinion called stupid and hypocritical. Opinions are not sacred things which can't be judged. Free speech is a bitch, if you share your opinion, you open yourself up to having that opinion judged.
I've noticed a big movement from people who want to hold stupid opinions yet don't want their stupid opinions called out for being stupid where they pretend that it's a violation of their freedom of speech to have their stupid opinions called out for being stupid.
Last edited by Tucker Case; 05-18-14 at 08:09 AM.
Tucker Case - Tard magnet.
As fas as I know, Vick's victims are not....unless Vick were to fight them on equal level, in the cage.
One old man against a united front vs dogs fighting until they are maimed or dead, not to mention the bait dogs.
If you want to apply motive to things, then we can say Vick gave money to animal charities and donated his time just to placate his critics so he could get back into the league.
If you look at why somebody does something and discount all the good they do if they don't have 100% altruistic motives, then you will never accept any good that is done in the world.
Most people give money to charity for the tax break.
Does that negate the good that is done with that money?