• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was Jesus White?

Was Jesus White?

  • Yep, white as a Viking, despite being an Arab!

    Votes: 8 23.5%

  • Yes, because Arabs are white, too. Have you ever actually looked at a Lebanese person?

    Votes: 4 11.8%

  • No, he wasn't white, because Arabs aren't white, only European are white.

    Votes: 22 64.7%
  • Total voters
    34
Soupnazi630 said:
Mass is directly observed and measured not just the motion that is fact.

Science runs off of observations not assumptions you simply know nothing of science.
Click to expand...

Wrong! The measurement of mass can only be inferred from other observable phenomenon because it is an assumed quantity.
 
MildSteel said:
Wrong! The measurement of mass can only be inferred from other observable phenomenon because it is an assumed quantity.
Click to expand...

Wrong again mass is directly observed and measured. Try a science class you have proven your earlier posts were false you know nothing of science that that is absolute fact which wraps this up
 
Soupnazi630 said:
Wrong again mass is directly observed and measured. Try a science class you have proven your earlier posts were false you know nothing of science that that is absolute fact which wraps this up
Click to expand...

:lamo

You don't understand high school physics concepts, much less any substantial science.

I tried to teach you some elementary physics. But you won't listen.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
 
MildSteel said:
:lamo

You don't understand high school physics concepts, much less any substantial science.

I tried to teach you some elementary physics. But you won't listen.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
Click to expand...

Yes I understand them far better than you.

You attempted to deny rules of science and reality in an effort to look like you know something about the subject.

Like I said try a science class you are woefully ignorant of the subject.

You tried to teach falsehoods little one. The facts prove you wrong
 
vasuderatorrent said:
Does that mean people could see right through all of his "parables"?
Click to expand...
No. Just that they can never see him/her/it.

They could still hear talking, if was clear. And write down the talking.
 
MildSteel said:
There is no direct evidence that mass causes motion. There is simply no direct evidence that mass exists. It is something that is measured from other observable quantities. This is because the notion of mass is an assumption that is used to explain motion. There is no way around this. In a similar way, we can observe sentience, and it's reasonable to assume that sentience has come from a superior sentience. If you don't say that, you are left with trying to explain how sentience has come from something that is insentient. And you cannot give a reasonable explanation for it. You can make the statement that we observe brains evolving, but where did the brains come from? Not only that, but ultimately, the brain is just a configuration of atoms. For your assumption that sentience has come from matter to be reasonable, you need to explain how is it that such atoms have integrated their activity in such a way as to form the integrated notion of sentience. It's a totally absurd notion that sentience has come from matter.
Click to expand...

It seems obvious you wish to avoid debate by bringing irrelevant subjects into the actual discussion....I am unwilling to play that game.


I suggest you try this on someone else, I am done here.
 
Soupnazi630 said:
Yes I understand them far better than you.

You attempted to deny rules of science and reality in an effort to look like you know something about the subject.

Like I said try a science class you are woefully ignorant of the subject.

You tried to teach falsehoods little one. The facts prove you wrong
Click to expand...

You are telling me I need to take a science class, but at the same time you want to say that you understand mass, but when I asked you a very simple question about motion, you could not answer. What's the answer to the question I asked you earlier concerning translational and rotational motion since you understand the concept of mass so well? What's the matter, cat got your tongue?
 
tecoyah said:
It seems obvious you wish to avoid debate by bringing irrelevant subjects into the actual discussion....I am unwilling to play that game.


I suggest you try this on someone else, I am done here.
Click to expand...

I would suggest that you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. This type of subject is for thinking people.
 
MildSteel said:
I would suggest that you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. This type of subject is for thinking people.
Click to expand...


Very well....I'll be in the pantry.

Good luck.
 
MildSteel said:
You are telling me I need to take a science class, but at the same time you want to say that you understand mass, but when I asked you a very simple question about motion, you could not answer. What's the answer to the question I asked you earlier concerning translational and rotational motion since you understand the concept of mass so well? What's the matter, cat got your tongue?
Click to expand...

Your questions are simple minded evasion of the fact that mass is directly measured and observed which you deny.

You can spin all you like but when you denied that fact you proved to be ignorant of science.
 
tecoyah said:
It seems obvious you wish to avoid debate by bringing irrelevant subjects into the actual discussion....I am unwilling to play that game.


I suggest you try this on someone else, I am done here.
Click to expand...

Yes that is part of his spin
 
Soupnazi630 said:
Your questions are simple minded evasion of the fact that mass is directly measured and observed which you deny.

You can spin all you like but when you denied that fact you proved to be ignorant of science.
Click to expand...

You better hide behind a wall of babble. Remember, stay on your level.
 
Many years ago Schopenhauer made the following very astute observation

We. . . now send the Brahmins English clergymen and evangelical linen-weavers to set them right out of sympathy, and to show them that they are created out of nothing, and ought thankfully to rejoice in the fact. But it is just the same as if we fired a bullet against a cliff. In India our religions will never take root. The ancient wisdom of the human race will not be displaced by what happened in Galilee. On the contrary, Indian philosophy streams back to Europe, and will produce a fundamental change in our knowledge and thought.
Click to expand...

He was right on mark. The time has indeed come. Those guys in the nineteenth century were heavy thinkers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom