The fact of the matter is that Al Qaeda was in Iraq. Go to the library and read some history. I suggest reading "Operation Hotel California" for starters if you wish to know more about what AQ was doing in Iraq prior to the 2003 invasion. It was written by someone who was actually there. AQ was in Iraq fighting against Saddam's long time enemies, the KDP .
Last edited by Muhammed; 05-11-14 at 06:48 AM.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
But of course the LWNJ noise machine will keep the ignorant ignorant regarding the truth. The US Democratic party wouldn't even exist if there were not so damn many ignorant fools out there.
Last edited by Muhammed; 05-11-14 at 07:28 AM.
Know what I mean?
Second, I'll address one of your comments to me ... Hillary said ...
: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans?What difference at this point does it make?and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.It is our job to figure out what happened
So which is it? Does it make no difference why the 4 Americans were killed or who did it ? ... or is the job is to figure out that very thing? Can't do the latter if you believe the former.
And the rest of her comment reiterated that contradiction.
Hillary is learning from her boss (at the time).
What Obama did was make a passing comment about "act of terror" so he can later point to that if he needs to, while simultaneously getting himself and his troops to blame a video.
He's covered, she's covered, and you bought the blanket.
Third ... As to Hillary and the video ...
'Two days after this attack,' said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, 'we were in a briefing with Hillary Clinton and she screamed at a member of Congress who’d dare suggest that this was a terrorist attack.'
The congressman appeared on the Fox News Channel on Friday, recalling Clinton 'basically, in a very loud, angry voice, [saying] "It's irresponsible to even suggest this is a terror attack. This is a YouTube video. We know that there are protests all over, and we need to be very careful how we're saying this" -- and basically chided this member of Congress.'
Read more: Hillary Clinton exploded at a congressman two days after Benghazi for suggesting that the attack was the work of terrorists, says GOP Rep. | Mail Online