• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is There A War On Masculinity Going On In The United States?

Is there a war going on against masculinity in the United States?

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 42.9%
  • No

    Votes: 32 57.1%

  • Total voters
    56
Oh no, I totally mean Magnum PI circa 1984.

I actually thought Magnum, in his tight shorts, living with his effeminate room mate, was kinda gay.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. :lol:
 
I actually thought Magnum, in his tight shorts, living with his effeminate room mate, was kinda gay.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. :lol:

There's nothing gay about that chest hair, that roguish smile, that mustache....um...

Crap...
 
Magnum PI does not sit down to pee!!!

Well, if i was him, in his tight shorty-shorts, I would. I hate it when the back-splash comes up and gets on my legs. Eeee-yewwww....
 
Are you hinting that the situation is not the same in the south?

If not, English please?

That was a nursery rhyme, ding dong bell, or something like that.
 
I see. What you have just posted is evidence of why feminists feel the way they do.
I wonder if even you know what you're talking about, insecure lightweight.

As for the femiclowns, you're not likely to upset me for bringing any suffering on their part to my attention.
 
What role did nurses play against masculine males of USA?

OK, I'll spell it out.

Ding dong bell
***** in the well
 
I wonder if even you know what you're talking about, insecure lightweight.

As for the femiclowns, you're not likely to upset me for bringing any suffering on their part to my attention.

Let me spell it out for you. Integrity is a function of knowledge. Knowledge is a function of understanding the truth. When one understand the truth, he understands that he has many limits and faults, and therefore he has nothing to be arrogant about. That's just plain fact.

One the other hand, an arrogant person, observing his own faults, seeks to rid himself of those faults by projecting them onto others. In this way he arrogantly feels that he is better than others, although in reality he is full of filth.
 
Women used sex against male masculinity? This sounds counter-evolutionary! ;)

You asked how it got that way. But honestly, that is subjective. I really can't say that is fact.
 
I was looking for some background information on another topic when I stumbled across a website. I thought it was very interesting. Here's the link

Mission Statement | Women for Men






So what do you think? Is there a war going on against masculinity in the United States?


Not just the United States, but the world. Are their any commercials not involving beer and cars that depict men as idiots?

Is there a sitcom where the man is not a dolt?

And let's look at most of the women hosts in MSM......

"Empowering" has come to mean degrading.
 
Let me spell it out for you. Integrity is a function of knowledge. Knowledge is a function of understanding the truth. When one understand the truth, he understands that he has many limits and faults, and therefore he has nothing to be arrogant about. That's just plain fact.

One the other hand, an arrogant person, observing his own faults, seeks to rid himself of those faults by projecting them onto others. In this way he arrogantly feels that he is better than others, although in reality he is full of filth.
Christ....

I might have asked someone else to re-read the post that had inflamed their inferiority, but you're a mediocre n00b on a mission. Rest assured, there's often an ingrained magnanimity that flowers in tandem with inordinate facility. Which is why some of us look out for you as you flounder. We demand no payment. It's a labour of love.

Pray continue with the club-footed theatrics. He who laughs last laughs....well, last, actually. If at all.
 
Is there a war going on against masculinity in the United States?
`
Personally, I think the entire notion is absurd. However, I have seen and experienced a definite rise in misogynistic thought, particularly among certain US religions and ideologies.
`
 
Feminists have been fighting to suppress men's attitudes and behaviors since probably the 1960's, so yeah, the war against masculinity has been going on for a long time now.
 
Not just the United States, but the world. Are their any commercials not involving beer and cars that depict men as idiots?

Is there a sitcom where the man is not a dolt?

And let's look at most of the women hosts in MSM......

"Empowering" has come to mean degrading.

Yeah I noticed that about the TV shows too. Men are some stupid Homer Simpson like idiot.
 
Christ....

I might have asked someone else to re-read the post that had inflamed their inferiority, but you're a mediocre n00b on a mission. Rest assured, there's often an ingrained magnanimity that flowers in tandem with inordinate facility. Which is why some of us look out for you as you flounder. We demand no payment. It's a labour of love.

Pray continue with the club-footed theatrics. He who laughs last laughs....well, last, actually. If at all.

Fine. Whatever gets your rocks off. That said, feminists have a point I guess. That's the way they keep such people in check.
 
`
Personally, I think the entire notion is absurd. However, I have seen and experienced a definite rise in misogynistic thought, particularly among certain US religions and ideologies.
`

According to feminists that has always been there and that is the problem that they want to correct.
 
`
Personally, I think the entire notion is absurd. However, I have seen and experienced a definite rise in misogynistic thought, particularly among certain US religions and ideologies.
`

I'm wondering if the truth really is that as misogyny becomes increasingly less institutionalized and less common, that the bona fide misogynists aren't in fact just sticking out like sore thumbs. Even if you just watch movies and television from the 80's depictions of women in the work place and at home are, by comparison to modern day, just a small step away from what goes on in in your average episode of Madmen.
 
According to feminists that has always been there and that is the problem that they want to correct.
`
Unfortunately, the word "feminist" has been so maligned and distorted my the media and idealouges, it means next to nothing to me. I advocate "women's rights". In the words of Susan B. Anthony, ""Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less". As I am not a child of the 60's, 70's or even 80's, I'm way past the "femanazi" garbage and absolutely reject the conservatives rights idea of what constitutes a proper woman, to me a feminist (is such a thing even exists) are just ordinary women who want equality.
`
 
Fine. Whatever gets your rocks off. That said, feminists have a point I guess. That's the way they keep such people in check.
See, now we're talking (after a fashion). The only 'points' they ever had (and for which they insinuate exclusivity) were legitimised and acknowledged by society, long before the advent of their misandrist, extremist fringe. They trade in perceived victimhood as a vehicle to concessions. Nothing more. What the idiots must find especially galling is gender equality as an invention of, and ushered in by, men. lulz

You don't have to swallow their BS, brah. They're not victims and you don't owe them a thing, much less submission to gynocentrism. Who the **** wants to live in the world as crafted by them? They're brainless ****bags.
 
`
Unfortunately, the word "feminist" has been so maligned and distorted my the media and idealouges, it means next to nothing to me. I advocate "women's rights". In the words of Susan B. Anthony, ""Men, their rights and nothing more; women, their rights and nothing less". As I am not a child of the 60's, 70's or even 80's, I'm way past the "femanazi" garbage and absolutely reject the conservatives rights idea of what constitutes a proper woman, to me a feminist (is such a thing even exists) are just ordinary women who want equality.
`

Well, there are feminists, and some of them are an influential part of the intellectual community. I don't have a problem with women's rights, but I have a problem when such persons want to define what it is to be man, what it means to be a woman, and how men and women should relate to each other. What is particularly disturbing is that some of them occupy positions in institutions of higher education and from those positions, they have influenced some people with some very extreme, insane views.
 
See, now we're talking (after a fashion). The only 'points' they ever had (and for which they insinuate exclusivity) were legitimised and acknowledged by society, long before the advent of their misandrist, extremist fringe. They trade in perceived victimhood as a vehicle to concessions. Nothing more. What the idiots must find especially galling is gender equality as an invention of, and ushered in by, men. lulz

You don't have to swallow their BS, brah. They're not victims and you don't owe them a thing, much less submission to gynocentrism. Who the **** wants to live in the world as crafted by them? They're brainless ****bags.

I see. I'm very sorry I wasted your time and mine.
 
Back
Top Bottom