- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 32,516
- Reaction score
- 5,321
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Re: Which Is More Important? The Right to Discriminate, or Freedom from Discriminati
here again, you cut things to..... to fine a point.....
you cannot exercise a right on my property......what does this mean?...it means you cannot exercise them if i don't want you to without consequences.
speech:...you exercise you right to speech on my property, 99.9% i will not care what you say....however if you become loud, and noisy and bother other customers, i will ask you to keep it down, if you refuse, i ask you to leave, if you refuse, i call the police...you can continue to exercise speech, until the police arrive which i explain to them what has happened, and they take you out ending your free speech in my business, with you facing the consequences of your actions.
again, with force: you exercise you right to speech on my property, 99.9% i will not care what you say....however if you become loud, and noisy and bother other customers, i will ask you to keep it down, if you refuse, i ask you to leave, if you refuse, push me, then hit me, i see this as a threat from you, i then have the authority to hit you, and restrain you until police arrive....which they cuff and book you for assault on me.....during this whole time, i hit and restrain you, you are able to speak...but your speech comes to an end, when you are taken out of my place by force of law.
LOL. Sorry doing things with the wife.
Or in other words consequences. There is a big difference between not having rights while on your property and having to risk expulsion from your property from exercising those rights. You keep saying that no one has executable right while on your property, which is an untrue statement. Even when you show you know better as you do below you go back to that same statement and collapse your whole argument. My right to free speech does not give me a right to be on your property, but neither does your property rights give you the right to silence me while on your property. For that matter, not even while I am refusing to leave, even as the cops are dragging me away. Even they are not allowed to silence me. The only real privilege I receive while on your property is the privilege on being on your property.
I think it's been made clear by several people that such is a violation of rights, regardless of what side of the discrimination line they are falling.
here again, you cut things to..... to fine a point.....
you cannot exercise a right on my property......what does this mean?...it means you cannot exercise them if i don't want you to without consequences.
speech:...you exercise you right to speech on my property, 99.9% i will not care what you say....however if you become loud, and noisy and bother other customers, i will ask you to keep it down, if you refuse, i ask you to leave, if you refuse, i call the police...you can continue to exercise speech, until the police arrive which i explain to them what has happened, and they take you out ending your free speech in my business, with you facing the consequences of your actions.
again, with force: you exercise you right to speech on my property, 99.9% i will not care what you say....however if you become loud, and noisy and bother other customers, i will ask you to keep it down, if you refuse, i ask you to leave, if you refuse, push me, then hit me, i see this as a threat from you, i then have the authority to hit you, and restrain you until police arrive....which they cuff and book you for assault on me.....during this whole time, i hit and restrain you, you are able to speak...but your speech comes to an end, when you are taken out of my place by force of law.