- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,102
- Reaction score
- 33,446
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
How convenient.
How is a difference in "the man" relevant?
Would it matter to you?
How convenient.
How is a difference in "the man" relevant?
Would it matter to you?
It mattered enough for you to make the claim on my post. Now you're doubtful that your answer would matter to me.
For future reference, keep that in mind.
Oh, no, no, no... I am not proposing to stagnate! Who could do such a thing?
I propose an explanation as to why the media and the education system is "dumbing down" Americans.I have heard complaints about it and thus propose the explanation that the purpose to "dumb down" may be equalization of intelligences.
The bottom line is that any explanation that concludes the position of the black population in American society is a function of some deficiency of blacks and "black culture" is racist. Even further, those who advocate that explanation are racists and those who persistently remain silent in the face of that explanation are cowards.
Soon it wont matter because all of us will be poor.
With the extinction of the middle class on the horizon and the Right's quest to take from the poor and give to the 1%, it wont be long before all of us are clumped together at the bottom with the 1% owning it all.
Our infrastructure will begin to fail in less than 20 years but we can't build a bridge because some billionaire needs some welfare, somewhere.
Soon it wont matter because all of us will be poor.
With the extinction of the middle class on the horizon and the Right's quest to take from the poor and give to the 1%, it wont be long before all of us are clumped together at the bottom with the 1% owning it all.
Our infrastructure will begin to fail in less than 20 years but we can't build a bridge because some billionaire needs some welfare, somewhere.
You have never seen 'poor'.
If you want to see poor, go to North Korea, where the people are eating grass.
When was the last time that you ate grass? fill us in.
Basically to put it more succintly, I am trying to draw a distinction between:
1) "Black culture" (and the negative aspects thereof) are the product of black people being black and lazy and ignorant, versus
2) "Black culture" (and the negative aspects thereof) are the product of centuries of oppression, segregation, marginalization and discrimination. I think this is a key difference between how left and right wingers talk about race.
This is true in terms of how black Americans are perceived outside of black America and particularly by white Americans. However, within black America, the members distinguish each other into subgroups based on variables like education, income, politics, location, etc.. Those subgroups are not as widely recognized and acknowledged outside of the black population, however, because black Americans rarely gets the benefit of having the heterogeneity within their racial group recognized and acknowledged by white Americans, who are "in charge". This is true, to an extent, for many other nonwhite populations as well.I also thought of this. White americans are funneled into subgroups within their ethnicity based on other variables such as income or education etc.; Redneck and white trash are just one example I can think of of how . I don't see the same thing happening with black americans. Other than thug vs black dude. It seems stop their, with the occasional "oh, he's just like" being viewed as an anomaly.
This is true in terms of how black Americans are perceived outside of black America and particularly by white Americans. However, within black America, the members distinguish each other into subgroups based on variables like education, income, politics, location, etc.. Those subgroups are not as widely recognized and acknowledged outside of the black population, however, because black Americans rarely gets the benefit of having the heterogeneity within their racial group recognized and acknowledged by white Americans, who are "in charge". This is true, to an extent, for many other nonwhite populations as well.
Ultimately, the individuality within and heterogeneity of a population gets more widespread recognition in proportion to how much power it has because with that power, it is able to spread knowledge of those distinctions. Without that power, such distinctions tend to stay
...people don't want to understand the issue. People want to believe in narratives of the welfare queen, the violent black man, colorblindness, meritocracy and whatever other story (read: myth) white people have crafted in order to make themselves feel better about their role in the oppression of black Americans and hide, from themselves, the reality of how pervasive racism and its effects still are in our current society.
The bolded is the primary reason I don't give any specific cultural group a free pass. Many of our immigrants come here with barely a pot to piss in, and somehow, many of them manage to succeed, in spite of language barriers and cultural barriers.
Why (If it was possible.) would anyone want to try to equalize intelligence?
How would this help humanity?
Explain that to us if you can. :lamo
IMO, the source of 'black' poverty is a lack of integration.
'Blacks' should be integrating with other 'races' FAR more then they do.
Stop grouping only with other 'blacks', move out of 'black ghetto's' and into better areas...even if it means sharing apartments to get by at first.
Now that's FUNNY. It seems that the people in Toronto feel the exact reverse method is the solution:
Back-to-school had a new twist for more than 100 students in Toronto on Tuesday as an Africentric alternative school opened its doors for the first time.
The black-focused school has sparked controversy, with opponents saying it smacks of segregation.
Supporters of the Africentric Alternative School maintain that it's important for children to understand their history and culture. They also point to a 40 per cent school dropout rate among black students.
"This will be an example of how we take the African experience and integrate it much more meaningfully and much more substantially into all areas of learning," said Lloyd McKell of the Toronto District School Board. . . .
The schools were created after parents banded together and lobbied school trustees.
At least the US can point to historic cultural problems, but Canada didn't have a sizable black community until Trudeau started importing black immigrants. Canadians can't point to Jim Crow or slavery as the problems behind a 40% drop-out rate.
You're saying the solution is more integration. The black parents in Toronto are saying no, not integration, but segregation is the solution.