• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN Poll: Most see Russia as a threat to U.S.

Is Russia a threat to the USofA


  • Total voters
    47
I voted not really in the sense that if we went to war against Russia we would win.But if did go to war against Russia it would cost us lots of lives and money.

I'm not sure I could "live" with your sense of "winning" a war with Russia. I think its a war not worth "winning". Mankind loses a war with Russia. Declaring a "winner" is moot as would worrying about the money.
 
I'm not sure I could "live" with your sense of "winning" a war with Russia. I think its a war not worth "winning". Mankind loses a war with Russia. Declaring a "winner" is moot as would worrying about the money.

^ "Run! Run! Hide! Hide!"
 
^ "Run! Run! Hide! Hide!"

The idea of war with Russia is nothing less than insanity... No need to run nor hide as either are useless. Then again, I believe humanity will ultimately self-destruct; its just a matter of time. I read Revelations and it reads like a vivid description of nuclear holocaust.
 
I'm not sure I could "live" with your sense of "winning" a war with Russia. I think its a war not worth "winning". Mankind loses a war with Russia. Declaring a "winner" is moot as would worrying about the money.

Winner is whoever doesn't give up. Wars can sometimes be more costly to the victor than the loser. World War 2 for example cost us nearly 50 million people their lives and almost 40 million of those lives lost were on the allied side while only nearly 10 million of those were on the Axis side.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I'm old school. Russia's threat to the US has been increasing under Putin, and anyone who doesn't believe Russia is a threat to the US now should simply listen to Putin's own words.

Putin knows what he wants. If the US or anyone else gets in the way of what he wants, he will run roughshod right over them or die trying.

So yeah, Russia is a threat.

So based on the last 100 years - would it be reasonable for other countries to view the USofA as a "threat"?

Isn't Russia doing exactly what the USofA does?

Which would be pretty much whatever we damn well please regardless of what the rest of the world thinks or wants?
 
At that time, probably. Even as kids we all suspected that an atomic bomb was bad, but in hindsight, we didn't have near the information at hand as we do today.

Given what most people know today...the profound damage caused by "relatively small atomic weapon", a couple of miles or so away from the point of detonation would probably, at the very least, do some serious cremation to everything in the blast range. And I guess that close enough to detonation that the blast would actually evaporate people, places and things.

Again, despite the fear that existed in those days about atomic bombs, I seriously don't recall that kind of devastation hitting home in the minds of most people...especially kids.

I think the reality hit home with me when I was a kid and saw a movie with Mickey Rooney called "The Atomic Kid".

I happen to watch a bit of the destruction of a half-mile wide tornado that came within 2 blocks of our home (in Dallas). I can't remember how many miles that it ran its course. My grandmother finally grabbed me off the front porch, wrapped me in a blanket, put me in our clawfoot bathtub. Our windows were shattered, debris made its way inside our house. And significant size debris was scattered in our yard, along with everybody else's yards along the path. It took us weeks to clean up after that incident and we weren't directly hit. Buildings that were dead in the path of that tornado, and which were similar to school structures at that time, were leveled. I still get a quiver from time to time thinking about that day.

EVERYBODY TODAY knows what the consequences can potentially be. But really, I don't think we really know what atomic weapons are capable of in present time. They can probably make an atomic weapon the size of an iPad that can do the damage done to Japan during WWII. Who knows? All governments lie so much.

Yep very few of us can fathom the power of a 5, 10 or 20 megaton device. Pretty sure I can die happy without one ever being set off over anyone's home
 
When I was a kid, we use to have atomic bomb drills every so often where we'd duck and cover under our desks. That was because of the threat from Russia. (USSR)

My father has told me about him having to do that as a child in his school. Funny, but sad at the same time.
 
The idea of war with Russia is nothing less than insanity... No need to run nor hide as either are useless. Then again, I believe humanity will ultimately self-destruct; its just a matter of time. I read Revelations and it reads like a vivid description of nuclear holocaust.

No point in arguing with someone who's opinions are based on the truth of the book of Revelations, is there?
 
I am beginning to believe that when it comes to the definition of "threat" it really boils down to this:

Any country that's big enough, and strong enough to not be persuaded, coerced, pressured, or threatened into doing what the USofA wants them to do, is a "threat".
 
I said maybe just because they are the second biggest nuclear power in the world. Not only that, I honestly didn't expect them to do what they did. They spent so much money on the olympics only to piss it away over a piece of land. I do think we should at least pay attention to what they are doing. They aren't like a middle eastern country with no clout. They are the real deal. We have history with these people. I think the possibility of them being a legitimate threat could come back if they don't step back from their current position.
 
Russia's Defense Budget: 90 Billion dollars a year.
United States Defense Budget: 683 Billion dollars a year.
Russia GDP: 2.4 trillion.
United States GDP: 17.4 trillion.

Russia cannot even afford to fuel its Navy enough to project power worldwide. There is zero chance, zero chance at all that Russia could challenge the United States as a the world's most powerful nation.

If the question was could they challenge us, I would have voted no. However, they definitely are a threat to our interests and therefore to us.
 
The bottom line here seems to be that the USofA always needs a boogieman.

And any boogieman will do.

The bigger the better.

Yeah, but guess what - sometimes there are boogiemen. They exist.
 
I am beginning to believe that when it comes to the definition of "threat" it really boils down to this:

Any country that's big enough, and strong enough to not be persuaded, coerced, pressured, or threatened into doing what the USofA wants them to do, is a "threat".

If you hate this country so much, why do you live here? You obviously have nothing but contempt for the United States, so much so that you would side with Russia in any dispute. Emigrate somewhere - you'll be much happier living in one of those nice, peaceful countries like Russia or China or North Korea.
 
If you hate this country so much, why do you live here? You obviously have nothing but contempt for the United States, so much so that you would side with Russia in any dispute. Emigrate somewhere - you'll be much happier living in one of those nice, peaceful countries like Russia or China or North Korea.

So to paraphrase, you actually pretty much agree with what I said, but you so hate to admit it that you'd rather just spout off some neocon-ish nonsense and act like you've made a biting and relevant point.


Gottcha.... :roll:
 
When I was a kid, we use to have atomic bomb drills every so often where we'd duck and cover under our desks. That was because of the threat from Russia. (USSR)

In looking back on the time, the only "real" threat of nuclear war was the Cuban missile crisis but that has since been revealed as a non threat. Hate to say it but you were duped by the exact same system of fear mongering that we are seeing with the righteous war on terror. It is perpetual fear and public reaction. Also one of the topics of Orwells dystopia in 1984
 
Last edited:
In looking back on the time, the only "real" threat of nuclear war was the Cuban missile crisis but that has since been revealed as a non threat. Hate to say it but you were duped by the exact same system of fear mongering that we are seeing with the righteous war on terror. It is perpetual fear and public reaction. Also one of the topics of Orwells dystopia in 1984

I agree but, then again only an *insane person would want to participate in nuclear annihilation. 8)

So the fear is not of war but of insanity.
 
Is the USA Russia's enemy?

Who has who surrounded with military bases?

What country on this planet spends the most on its military?

Irrelevant.
 
The U.S. has never not seen Russia as a threat. Even during its democratic heyday, people still saw Russia as the USSR and commie central. Nothing ever changes.

CNN is just putting out the usual media spin in an attempt to manufacture consent for the war machine.
 
Back
Top Bottom