• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Obama be impeached?

Should Obama be impeached?


  • Total voters
    81
We aint talkin McCain.....and Cruz wasn't talking government shutdown with this issue. Glad you prove that its beyond your comprehension and that you are really not up on politics. From Politico: Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) joined with a handful of other Republican politicians Wednesday, warning the President that his impeachment could be near. According to Tulsa World, at a convention in Muskogee, Okla., Coburn said Wednesday that the president was “getting perilously close” to the Constitutional standard for impeachment. He also called the Obama administration lawless and incompetent, the news site reported, although he acknowledged the president as a “personal friend.”.... Sen. Coburn Says Obama Impeachment Could Be Near - Hit & Run : Reason.com

Laffin, you are starting to bluff and bluster now... :roll:

I mention McCain as he at least says what he means on various issues than ***** mouthed Cruz when it comes to impeachment. Cruz at a tiny GOP chapter's dinner and Coburn in his old stomping ground of East Oklahoma can do no better than repeat the same old 'lawless' crap but short stroke any call for action- other than vote for the GOP...

These 'polite' senators use such terms as lawless, most lawless, BUT tap dance around using the 'I' word... :lamo

They are not being polite, they know they have no Constitutional leg to stand on and they damn well know it :doh

Still it is fun to see a CON struggle with reality. :2wave:
 
The truth hurts my left wing friend.

But it's not true. This idea that Republicans resign when they get in trouble but Democrats don't is pure fiction. It's false. It's made up. It's not true. It's Bull****.
 
and you know this how?
We all know where the height of partisanship LIES, don't we my right-wing friend ?

Because unlike you I was and adult when those terrible things happened.
 
mkn3.png


Live from CPAC: The Most Important Panel Everyone Missed | Brookings Institution


Anybody can join. You do have to be a Conservative, though. If you're not a Conservative, you're probably better off staying in that big, braying Liberal circus tent of diversity.
 
Now pay attention........The embassies you mentioned were tragic...The difference is there was no lying and cover up about them...........Surely someone as partisan as you can see the difference?????

Pot, kettle, black, all that stuff.

You got that right......the man is a mental midget and God forbid if he ever was president.

Joe Biden is a thousand times smarter than you.

Or if Clinton would have accepted Bin Laden on a silver platter when offered but he ws to busy getting BJs in the oval office.........

Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?
 
Yes Obama should be impeached. If the House Of Representatives are going to be the most unproductive House in history then at least I should be entertained.

Wake up my left wing friend..............The HOR has passed dozens of bills but "Dingy" Harry Reid won't bring them to the floor for a vote.
 
And you have zero proof to back up your smears of Democratic Presidents .
Because unlike you I was and adult when those terrible things happened.
 
How many of those House bills are 'clean', without legislative riders they attached last September ?
Wake up my left wing friend..............The HOR has passed dozens of bills but "Dingy" Harry Reid won't bring them to the floor for a vote.
 
Wake up my left wing friend..............The HOR has passed dozens of bills but "Dingy" Harry Reid won't bring them to the floor for a vote.

it is a parliamentary tactic, just like the ones used by the republican majority in the House of representives to keep the democrats from passing discharge petitions on pieces of legislature passed by the senate.
 
4,000 people died in a terrorist attack that could have been avoided if the Bush administration had paid a lick of attention to the PDB.

I see liberal revisionist history is at work. We are now at 4,000 deaths and because G.W. Bush stuck with Clinton's failed terrorist policies that Al Qaeda wasn't a national security issue but a law enforcement issue and it's now Bush's fault ignoring the findings of the 9-11 Commission.

As the 9-11 Commission findings were that there is blame to go all around going back to the Democrats in Congress during the Carter administration. If you were to weigh all of the evidence who really ###### up on a scale, most of it falls on the Clinton administration starting in Mogadishu, Somalia.

What President G.W. Bush didn't do, was to spend eight years blaming Clinton's failed counter terrorist policies.
 
And you have zero proof to back up your smears of Democratic Presidents .

The only people that don't believe that those terrible terrorist attacks were well reported when they happened are lefties like you.
 
Still no proof.
You dismiss yourself with general platitudes .
The only people that don't believe that those terrible terrorist attacks were well reported when they happened are lefties like you.
 
I see liberal revisionist history is at work.

I see APACHERAT is lying again.

Bush didn't HAVE an anti-terrorism policy before 9/11.

And it was ~3,000, that was a typo.
 
it is a parliamentary tactic, just like the ones used by the republican majority in the House of representives to keep the democrats from passing discharge petitions on pieces of legislature passed by the senate.


ROTFLMAO.........You have to be kidding me...............weak at best my left wing friend........I can't even say nice try.
 
ROTFLMAO.........You have to be kidding me...............weak at best my left wing friend........I can't even say nice try.

You haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about.
 
I see APACHERAT is lying again.

Bush didn't HAVE an anti-terrorism policy before 9/11.

And it was ~3,000, that was a typo.


ROTFLMAO you never cease to amaze me.
 
You haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about.

This conversation is over my left wing friend all you bring to the table is personal attacks........Have a nice evening.
 
I see liberal revisionist history is at work. We are now at 4,000 deaths and because G.W. Bush stuck with Clinton's failed terrorist policies that Al Qaeda wasn't a national security issue but a law enforcement issue and it's now Bush's fault ignoring the findings of the 9-11 Commission.

As the 9-11 Commission findings were that there is blame to go all around going back to the Democrats in Congress during the Carter administration. If you were to weigh all of the evidence who really ###### up on a scale, most of it falls on the Clinton administration starting in Mogadishu, Somalia.

What President G.W. Bush didn't do, was to spend eight years blaming Clinton's failed counter terrorist policies.

because clinton's "failed"counter terrorism policies did not involve the united states getting involved in open ended wars.

and there is one accomplishment that carter has that no republican administration can copy: Negotating the peace agreement between egypt and Isreal and cause egypt to be the first arab country to recognize the Rights of Israel.

too bad the previous administration did not understand how fight war.
 
I see APACHERAT is lying again.

Bush didn't HAVE an anti-terrorism policy before 9/11.

And it was ~3,000, that was a typo.

What's your profession again ?

Bush's anti-terrorist policies were the same as Clinton's.

What Bush should have done was removed the "wall" that Clinton's Attorney General, Janet Reno put up so the NSA, CIA, ONI, military intelligence, FBI, NIS, USMS and local, county, and state law enforcement could communicate with each other and share intelligence without breaking the law that the Clinton administration created.
 
because clinton's "failed"counter terrorism policies did not involve the united states getting involved in open ended wars.

and there is one accomplishment that carter has that no republican administration can copy: Negotating the peace agreement between egypt and israel and cause egypt to be the first arab country to recognize the Rights of Israel. too bad the previous administration did not understand how fight war.

And what was Barack Obama's response to that ? He threw a long time ally who protected Israels southern flank under the bus.

In four years Obama has turned the entire Middle East and North Africa into a complete basket case. Frickin outstanding.
 
Back
Top Bottom