- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Depends on that "state". If it shows some sweater meat or snapper, that'd be illegal. Bra and panties, not so much.
you'd think the pervs would merely watch tennis or skating
View attachment 67163020
View attachment 67163021
They probably do that too. :lol:
I'd figure Ana Ivanovic and Sarah Hughes are far better to look at than the average woman on a street
But they can't get close to those women. Honestly, these guys are probably hoping to get pictures of women without panties or ill-fitting panties where they aren't covering everything so well. :lol: Do they care about what the woman looks like as long as she isn't hideous? They just getting crotch shots after all.
who knows-maybe its the thrill of the hunt
he could buy a ballet magazine and see much better looking stuff under skirts
View attachment 67163022
Who knows what makes the mind of a pervert tick? :lol: It's probably just some weird fetish or something.
I don't see how a person would know if the person is wearing panties or not though. It could go either way there.
never said that. Wish you would read what I wrote. I said the law AS WRITTEN didn't cover this circumstance (according to the articles). If the judge had ruled that the law did cover this, that would have been the judge making law. I'm not necessarily against that, but that's not really what we want judges doing.
I agree with you. I can't believe there isn't law that would cover privacy or something.
Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal - CNN.com
WHAT????/QUOTE]How can upskirt photo taking NOT be an invasion of privacy?????[
It's an obvious, and outrageous, invasion of privacy to say the least.
Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal - CNN.com
WHAT???? How can upskirt photo taking NOT be an invasion of privacy?????
One of the greatest lack of protective laws is in the area of privacy.
Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal - CNN.com
WHAT???? How can upskirt photo taking NOT be an invasion of privacy?????
So people are saying there should be a law against taking photos of peoples undies in public?
Someone should be arrested for this photo!
And what law do you suggest? Pornography? No nudity involved. Voyeurism? Nope. Same as before. Trespassing? Public domain. Assault? No bodily harm took place.
The only argument is if you tried for some "public decency", but that's a slippery slope.
I saw a woman in the mall the other day walking around with her pants half down like guys do. Would it be illegal to take of picture of her?
Just saying. It may not be so simple to pin this down.
Check out tumblr, photoblogger, or any one of those sites, and there are plenty of candids of people on there that people have taken of others... like guys working out that the gym, hot women on the bus/train, etc. Privacy has changed in the past 15 years. Everyone has a smart phone with a camera now.
This is the price of freedom. You don't get to tell people they can't upskirt you when there might be any number of opportunities for them to do it, even self-created ones. You are responsible for protecting your own privacy. There shouldn't be laws to do it for you.
It's an invasion of privacy. Like ChrisL said - much like a peeping tom scenario.