- Joined
- Mar 5, 2014
- Messages
- 4,974
- Reaction score
- 1,047
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
There is less rape, less crime
HMMMM....
I don't know if that's true.
There is less rape, less crime
Looking and taking a photo are different things.
HMMMM....
I don't know if that's true.
HMMMM....
I don't know if that's true.
Nope. Not even close.
Just a few numbers, but these were easiest to find.
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hb9411.pdf
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf
Of course, I heard about this on my local news today. :roll: Disgusting. Hopefully something is done about this.
What's disturbing about this, is that these guys aren't just doing this for themselves, they put this crap online. Losers.
Because the law wasn't written to cover this situation. I certainly hope the Massachusetts lawmakers amend the law to cover this.
Me too. I'm sure something will be done. I'm still stunned that this couldn't be covered under some kind of law. Sure cell phones are new, but cameras sure aren't. I would have thought this would be covered under some kind of laws about voyeurism, like peeping toms!
Agree, Sad that it wasn't covered.
Me too. I'm sure something will be done. I'm still stunned that this couldn't be covered under some kind of law. Sure cell phones are new, but cameras sure aren't. I would have thought this would be covered under some kind of laws about voyeurism, like peeping toms!
And what law do you suggest? Pornography? No nudity involved. Voyeurism? Nope. Same as before. Trespassing? Public domain. Assault? No bodily harm took place.
The only argument is if you tried for some "public decency", but that's a slippery slope.
What's the difference between this and taking a picture of someone in a state of undress? Just because they're wearing a skirt and in a public place? Their privacies are still being violated IMO.
I cannot see a grand jury, or a prosecutor, filing charges against some woman who just did her best field goal kicker tryout effort on the face of some asshole who was trying to take a picture of her panties under her skirt
Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal - CNN.com
WHAT???? How can upskirt photo taking NOT be an invasion of privacy?????
What's the difference between this and taking a picture of someone in a state of undress? Just because they're wearing a skirt and in a public place? Their privacies are still being violated IMO.
Can't really agree. The law was written in such a way that this was not illegal.
Or - did you want judges making laws? I thought you were against that, but I could be wrong.
Taking pictures up women's dresses is ok? If you think it's ok please don't respond.
Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal - CNN.com
WHAT???? How can upskirt photo taking NOT be an invasion of privacy?????
Taking pictures up women's dresses is ok? If you think it's ok please don't respond.