View Poll Results: Do you support reducing the military to pre-WWII levels?

Voters
50. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    30 60.00%
  • Sort of, it needs to shrink but not that small.

    9 18.00%
  • No - it's size should stay the same

    6 12.00%
  • No - it's size should be increased

    3 6.00%
  • Not sure

    2 4.00%
  • don't care

    0 0%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

  1. #31
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,828

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    I was being facetious - but I've seen it proposed.
    I've seen forced deportation of black people back to Africa proposed but that doesn't mean it's something worthy of discussion as if it's a real policy.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  2. #32
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    I've seen forced deportation of black people back to Africa proposed but that doesn't mean it's something worthy of discussion as if it's a real policy.
    Facetious isn't being serious.

    - Nevermind.
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  3. #33
    Student
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    05-14-14 @ 02:05 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    231

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    To those that replied yes, why did you? The first responsibility of the U.S. Federal Government is to protect our borders, our Country, our citizens. We need a force larger then all other Countries in order to protect us from attack by other Countries with large forces. Specifically, China, Northern Korea, Russia and so on.

    We should not cut our forces which among other things will increase the number of our unemployed but leave us vunerable to attack. Instead, we should cut our financial assistance to Countries that are potential enemies or support our potential enemies. I am not claiming to be a scholar when it comes to foreign policy, etc. But it seems to me that keeping a viable force should be are first priority.

  4. #34
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    Quote Originally Posted by fedupwithgov View Post
    To those that replied yes, why did you? The first responsibility of the U.S. Federal Government is to protect our borders, our Country, our citizens. We need a force larger then all other Countries in order to protect us from attack by other Countries with large forces. Specifically, China, Northern Korea, Russia and so on.

    We should not cut our forces which among other things will increase the number of our unemployed but leave us vunerable to attack. Instead, we should cut our financial assistance to Countries that are potential enemies or support our potential enemies. I am not claiming to be a scholar when it comes to foreign policy, etc. But it seems to me that keeping a viable force should be are first priority.
    Our force should be large enough to defend our country, not to defend and wage war in other countries. The lives of American citizens are worth more than Koreans, Chinese,Ukrainians and other people.We should not waste American lives and resources in those countries.

    We should all foreign aid.
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  5. #35
    Sage
    reinoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Out West
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    16,116
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    yes. then we should rehire those same patriots to rebuild America instead of sending them into harm's way.
    It's a good idea to use those members to restore our infrastructure, but the infrastructure industry doesn't have as many lobbyist as defense contractors.
    Trump Attacked A Syrian Airfield. Trump will be a one-term president.

  6. #36
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,112

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    Quote Originally Posted by reinoe View Post
    It's a good idea to use those members to restore our infrastructure, but the infrastructure industry doesn't have as many lobbyist as defense contractors.
    yeah, but it has a lot of people who are pretty tired of the status quo.

  7. #37
    Sage
    Navy Pride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Last Seen
    05-07-15 @ 02:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    39,883

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    When it comes to our military size you lefties are clueless.
    "God Bless Our Troops in Harms Way."

  8. #38
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:25 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,331
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    When it comes to our military size you lefties are clueless.
    I am willing to bet I know more than you on the subject. Want to try me?
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  9. #39
    Guru
    Morality Games's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Last Seen
    05-24-16 @ 10:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    3,733

    Re: Do you support reducing the US military to pre-WWII levels?

    There's more wealth, power, and security in alliances than without them. That makes the choice over whether to have allies or not sort of easy from a utilitarian perspective, which is (and generally has to be) the deciding factor in creating policy.

    That's not to say the United States hasn't been foolish or reckless. If the United States needed to be a hegemony at the end of WWII to stop the Soviets from taking over everything, we should have eased into a position of equality afterwards so there was less singular pressure to make things work out for the rest of the world. For whatever reason, our leadership in Washington became addicted to the sort of hegemony where other countries walked in lockstep with us and couldn't function once this adherence began to disappear.

    The other great power that took responsibility for making things work out was Athens, and they exacted heavy taxation from their allies for the service.
    Last edited by Morality Games; 03-04-14 at 03:37 AM.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •