• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michael Dunn Murder Trial of Jordan Davis guilty or not?

So far do you think Michael Dunn is guilty of murder?


  • Total voters
    40
Wow. Someone does think that.
Too bad there is no rule that says such.

the majority of the board agrees with me i was taght this by regulars and mod when i got here 4 years ago

but like i said if you want to go with them it looks like this LMAO

64 yes (92.75%) and 3 no (4.35%) and 2 others LMAO

because most arent topically uneducated enough to think he is guilty

btw when you gonna vote?
 
Wow. Someone actually believes a rule exist that does not exist.

Simply wow.
 
Wow. Someone actually believes a rule exist that does not exist.

Simply wow.

you gonna vote yet?
common tell us all what you think man up and cast your vote or you gonna dodge the request AGAIN lol
 
I have already stated my position on this subject.

Did you fail to read it?
 
I have already stated my position on this subject.

Did you fail to read it?

"translation" your scared to vote

lets us know when you are ready
 
"translation" your scared to vote

lets us know when you are ready
:doh

iLOL

Translation.
You have no idea if I voted or not.
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way.

:lamo
 
:doh

iLOL

Translation.
You have no idea if I voted or not.
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way.

:lamo

scared to vote we know
 
Last edited:
yes anonymous votes do not count because of spamming.

and yes that is the rule this is why any good poll is public because MODS have had to tell us what the REAL votes are for polls when they get spammed.

For example, what often happens is we cant see the votes but when the mods look, 5 members actually voted for item A, but then magically there 40 anonymous votes making the vote 45

and then theres 40 member votes for item B and 2 anonymous votes making the total 42

that poll was spammed



BUT by all means if you would like to include the spammed votes im more then fine with 64 yes (92.75%) and 3 no (4.35%) and 2 others LMAO

and ill gladly make a new statement that nobody was silly enough to publicly vote no

The mods are conveying some secret info to you?

What would a spammer be in this situation? Besides, YOU are who decided to make it anonymous. Why did you do that if you don't like it?

BTW - are they going for Murder 1 or Murder 2? I would think Murder 1 would be a stretch - and done only to allow the jury to compromise downward. Sounds like M2. Maybe even Manslaughter, but not M1.

I don't know enough to say. Just what I read in in a few press stories. The problem with cases like this is there is nothing indicating he desired to kill anyone, wasn't committing a robbery, not a domestic dispute and things happened fast. So the question is what REALLY happened and to try to figure out what was going on in his head. Plus when people start injecting race into the topic I get skeptical because people lie to make their point.
 
Last edited:
lets us know when you are ready to vote

:doh

iLOL

Translation.
You have no idea if I voted or not.
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way.

:lamo
 
1.)The mods are conveying some secret info to you?

2.)What would a spammer be in this situation?
3.)Besides, YOU are who decided to make it anonymous.
4.) Why did you do that if you don't like it?
5.)BTW - are they going for Murder 1 or Murder 2? I would think Murder 1 would be a stretch - and done only to allow the jury to compromise downward. Sounds like M2. Maybe even Manslaughter, but not M1.

1.) nope it was done publicly in the past i asked and a mof did it, just recently in this thread if you need an example

Poll numbers corrected.(for actual members)

currently its
21 yes
0 no
1 other

so your starwman fails

2.)a spammer would vote more than one time fot the vote he wants
3.) WRONG the poll is public thats why i posted the real vote, if you click on the votes it tells you who actually voted
4.) i didnt :shrug: try to keep up and pay attention please
5.) I dont know i didnt listen to every yet today, originally they were going for 1 count of M1, 3 counts of attempted murder

but i do agree M2 seems more reasonable although when they talked about the charges and the verbiage in Florida i see the angle they could take but again i agree with you its probably to deal down to M2 but the poll is just for murder
 
:doh

iLOL

Translation.
You have no idea if I voted or not.
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way.

:lamo

let us know when you are ready to vote, we'll be here waiting
 
And a 90 year old considers their 60 year old offspring their child. :doh

In my view, and I agree its just my view, its not a question of whether of not the rules of semantics say a 90 year old refers to a 60 year old as his "child" but rather does society and a persons' parents consider him to be a minor. An 11th grader s considered a minor except in places where human rights groups condemns them for not doing so. A 60 year old is not considered a minor, even by his parents.
 
let us know when you are ready to vote, we'll be here waiting

You are not making any sense in reply to what you have been told.

You have no idea if I voted or not. - Do you not understand that?
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way. - What is it about this that you do not understand?

It is like you do not know how to take no for an answer.
 
In my view, and I agree its just my view, its not a question of whether of not the rules of semantics say a 90 year old refers to a 60 year old as his "child" but rather does society and a persons' parents consider him to be a minor. An 11th grader s considered a minor except in places where human rights groups condemns them for not doing so. A 60 year old is not considered a minor, even by his parents.
And a more accurately and neutral description is young adults, as they were. Not kids, or children.
 
You are not making any sense in reply to what you have been told.

You have no idea if I voted or not. - Do you not understand that?
And I am not going to give you the satisfaction of knowing either way. - What is it about this that you do not understand?

It is like you do not know how to take no for an answer.

like i said we are her when you are ready to vote
 
we'll be here
 
yep to scared
You should really stop making idiotic assertion about others.
I have already stated my position on this case.
 
You should really stop making idiotic assertion about others.
I have already stated my position on this case.

Translation: "no agent J i wont publicly vote or stay on topic"
 
Back
Top Bottom