• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is religious freedom actually possible

Is religious freedom actually possible?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 58.7%
  • No

    Votes: 12 26.1%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 5 10.9%
  • I didnt bother reading the post so yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I didn't bother reading the post so no

    Votes: 2 4.3%

  • Total voters
    46
No. their insistence on building on that spot does. I'm surprised they didn't insist on building it atop ground zero itself.

um no building something doesn't make you a terrorist I think scaring people with violence might
 
You tell me.

you cant tell me why some one is a terrorist because someone else there not associated with or responsible for is

it wont go well for you if you try to any way
 
Is religious freedom actually possible?

Hell if I know.
 
you cant tell me why some one is a terrorist because someone else there not associated with or responsible for is

it wont go well for you if you try to any way

OOOO, I'm almost frightened.

Are you one of those mean ol' Islamists?
 
OOOO, I'm almost frightened.

Are you one of those mean ol' Islamists?

nope just worried your going to make yourself look crazy
 
ok what in that connects the Muslims with land in new York to committing acts of violence in order to scare people and thus making them actual terrorists?

I never said they were terrorists. My point was they build victory mosques or take an existing holy site and convert it into a mosque..
 
No. their insistence on building on that spot does. I'm surprised they didn't insist on building it atop ground zero itself.

um hears where you called them terrorists but perhaps that was a little stronger then you intended?
 
I never said they were terrorists. My point was they build victory mosques or take an existing holy site and convert it into a mosque..

where did they have a victory against who they just built some place in new York
 
You are confused or drunk, I don't know which.

nope

I ascked you

and not accepting a bribe makes you a secret terrorist how?

and you said

No. their insistence on building on that spot does.


that mean you said building there made those people terrorists

therefore you called them terrorists

perhaps you meant something else but its written for all to see on hear
 
nope

I ascked you

and not accepting a bribe makes you a secret terrorist how?

and you said

No. their insistence on building on that spot does.


that mean you said building there made those people terrorists

therefore you called them terrorists

perhaps you meant something else but its written for all to see on hear

In a troll's world perhaps. I'm not falling for your word play.
 
In a troll's world perhaps. I'm not falling for your word play.

no trolling or word play could you give me another explanation for what this means


I said
and not accepting a bribe makes you a secret terrorist how?

You said
No. their insistence on building on that spot does.
 
no trolling or word play could you give me another explanation for what this means


I said
and not accepting a bribe makes you a secret terrorist how?

You said
No. their insistence on building on that spot does.

So I guess I shouldn't comment on 'your' disinformation.

That's a childish game you're trying to play. Not only that but, it's way off topic and considered baiting.
 
So I guess I shouldn't comment on 'your' disinformation.

That's a childish game you're trying to play. Not only that but, it's way off topic and considered baiting.

its what you said iv suggested you did not mean to say it iv invited you to offer an alternative explanation but you said building on the site made them terrorists then you stated you said no such thing and its not true
 
So I guess I shouldn't comment on 'your' disinformation.

That's a childish game you're trying to play. Not only that but, it's way off topic and considered baiting.

what disinformation?
 
No, gays can not force any church to marry them. No one can force any church to marry them. Churches are allowed to discriminate in any way they choose, there was even a church a couple of years ago that refused to marry a heterosexual couple because they were black. Churches refuse to marry couple where one or both have been divorced, or are of different religions, or even interracial couples.
Gays just want the right to get a legal civil marriage.

So all those people marching on churches and gathering out front when one refuses a gay couple and demanding that they be allowed to marry there were just kidding? Interesting.
 
So all those people marching on churches and gathering out front when one refuses a gay couple and demanding that they be allowed to marry there were just kidding? Interesting.

What church in the US is being forced to marry a gay couple? None of them.

People marching or boycotting against things they disagree with does not force whoever they are marching against to do anything. The people marching have the freedom to voice their displeasure, and the churches have the freedom to tell them to go suck eggs.
 
So all those people marching on churches and gathering out front when one refuses a gay couple and demanding that they be allowed to marry there were just kidding? Interesting.

um gathering and demanding sounds like free speech

forcing is a bit different

where did this happen any way?
 
If your religious freedom is violated because I get married and that is against your religion, then that is your problem.
Do you feel that you are violating Muslims religious freedom because you eat pork?
Are you violating Hindus religious freedom by eating a cow?
Are you violating Jewish peoples religious freedom because you don't keep a kosher diet?

Not particularly, but i think the idea of the MYODB Party suits me very nicely.
 
Obviously not, because those who believe homosexuality is a sin, cannot be allowed to maintain that belief. You really could have just answered your own question without help. All other beliefs become irrelevant because you have disallowed the belief against homosexuality, thus perfect religious freedom is impossible.

/thread
So you are calling the beliefs held by billions of people irrelevant?
 
You beat me to it, my friend. I have never heard of a Buddhist tradition that does not accept gay people. Sexual orientation doesn't matter, and it shouldn't. It has nothing to do with Buddhism.

My apologies if i have insulted your religion. I heard somewhere that it did and that was obviously wrong. Again very sorry.
 
Back
Top Bottom