The topic is employment at will.
Also whistle blowers is another separate issue, just as the drinking fountains were, and is not a component in the principle that it is the employer's legally and ethically acquired the money, property, and other resources, and it is the employer who is taking almost all of the risk in owning and operating a business. The employee should have absolutely no right to anything the employer has EXCEPT that which is agreed beween the employer and employee.
So the employer should not have the right to break a contract between him and the whistle blower--the employer should have to give the employee whatever the employer had agreed with that employee including severance pay or any accumulated compensation for vacation/sick pay etc. if applicable. But yes, the employer should have the right to fire the whistle blower just as he must have the right to fire anybody for any reason if we are a nation that believes in liberty and unalienable rights.
"I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it." --Benjamin Franklin 1776
Poll numbers corrected.
"Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run
Mace Windu: Then our worst fears have been realized. We must move quickly if the Jedi Order is to survive.
so, why is only labor denied and disparaged in employment at will regarding unemployment compensation in any at-will employment State?