Moderator's Warning: Discuss the OP, not other posters.
Mind you, I would agree that that is likely not how a judge would rule; but that would be an indictment of our judiciary, not the law itself.
“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump
There should be Instant Runoff Voting
Yes, she would have been kicking people in the teeth. I'm sorry, but from what little I've read she hasn't put anything into the system, is perfectly able-bodied, and still would have wanted to take out of the system. Society/Government does not exist to ensure results, only opportunities. If she over-educated herself and happens to be of the wrong gender to be in the workplace to begin with, that's not Society/Government's fault.
Yes, my position is insensitive, becuase I take emotion out of things like this. I don't think a sustaining job exists or should exist for everyone, whether they want it or not. As I said, we improperly expanded the workforce while corespondingly decreasing jobs, so something like this had to happen eventually, one way or the other.
I am against the amount of welfare in America...it should be far less, IMO.
But taking away voting rights for those on it is moronic in the extremis.
'What kind of sick and twisted toy factory is this?'
'We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile, and nothing can grow there. Too much, the best of us is washed away.'
"Better to be dead and cool, than alive and uncool."
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”
― Stephen R. Covey