• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should welfare recipients be allowed to vote?[W:84]

Should those on welfare or any federal aid be allowed to vote?

  • Yes. Absolutely.

    Votes: 58 77.3%
  • No.

    Votes: 13 17.3%
  • Other?

    Votes: 4 5.3%

  • Total voters
    75
Michael Savage is not the only person to suggest this. Numerous others, including Rush Limbaugh, Neal Boortz, Greg Budell, and even Ed Leedskalnin have suggested this many times in the past. In fact, Neal even said that people's votes should be allocated on how much tax they paid.

WHY? THERE IS A GOOD REASON. Do you want your country to collapse?

For starters, government-run welfare of any kind is unconstitutional--for good reason. Allowing "parasites" who suck up the public treasury to vote themselves more money is NATIONAL SUICIDE!!!!!

Did you know that allowing masses of people to vote themselves benefits out of the public treasury was the downfall of CLASSICAL GREECE????

OK, now do you still want people to vote for their livings out of YOUR pocket? You do? THEN PUT YOURSELF OUT OF YOUR MISERY. Go grab Clint Eastwood's .44 magnum and BLOW YOUR OWN HEAD OFF!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom