View Poll Results: Should the amendments be re-ratified

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes they should

    1 11.11%
  • yes but some should be off limits (specify with comments)

    0 0%
  • No it is not necessary and the system works either way

    7 77.78%
  • maybe but it probably wont happen

    1 11.11%
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Re-ratification

  1. #1
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Colorado, U.S.A
    Last Seen
    06-05-14 @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    464

    Re-ratification

    Please read before voting


    Alright then people so i was browsing through another thread a few minutes ago and they had kind of deteriorated the conversation into what the constitutional amendments actually mean and whether we should have them repealed. So i started doing some passive research and you know what i found, almost half of the constitution was never ratified by states of today's america because they had not been created yet.

    So my question is, should we call for a re-ratification of the constitutional amendments so that all amendments have been thoroughly reviewed, and accepted or denied by the current states of america?
    War is not a tool to satisfy your emotional outbursts.

  2. #2
    Sage
    Kreton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Last Seen
    11-13-17 @ 08:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    6,118

    Re: Re-ratification

    Quote Originally Posted by JJB3333 View Post
    Please read before voting


    Alright then people so i was browsing through another thread a few minutes ago and they had kind of deteriorated the conversation into what the constitutional amendments actually mean and whether we should have them repealed. So i started doing some passive research and you know what i found, almost half of the constitution was never ratified by states of today's america because they had not been created yet.

    So my question is, should we call for a re-ratification of the constitutional amendments so that all amendments have been thoroughly reviewed, and accepted or denied by the current states of america?
    I'd be fine with that if it is voted on by the people of the United States and not just determined by politicians.
    “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”
    Stephen R. Covey


  3. #3
    Sage
    shrubnose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Last Seen
    11-29-17 @ 03:46 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    18,851
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Re-ratification

    Quote Originally Posted by JJB3333 View Post
    Please read before voting


    Alright then people so i was browsing through another thread a few minutes ago and they had kind of deteriorated the conversation into what the constitutional amendments actually mean and whether we should have them repealed. So i started doing some passive research and you know what i found, almost half of the constitution was never ratified by states of today's america because they had not been created yet.

    So my question is, should we call for a re-ratification of the constitutional amendments so that all amendments have been thoroughly reviewed, and accepted or denied by the current states of america?



    Sounds like a total waste of time and money to me.

  4. #4
    Guru
    soot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Seen
    04-25-17 @ 03:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    4,308

    Re: Re-ratification

    It's an interesting topic and certainly something that could be done but I don't see why anyone should call for a re-ratification.

    The Union is what the Union is.

    Territories appealed for admittance knowing full well what the Constitution said.

    I would think that making the appeal for admission, knowing what the law of the land was, and not requesting at that time that the Union make any concessions in terms of Constitutional amendments signals a de facto acceptance that the law as it existed at the time of their admission was acceptable.

    I think we could equally make the argument that since very few Americans who are alive today we're around for the ratification of of most of the amendments (the vast majority of Americans living today, about 85% +/-, were born some time after the 22nd was ratified in 1951) we should just re-ratify them all.

    We could apply the same logic to the basic Constitution itself, as far as that goes, since no living American was alive at the time it was ratified.

    The only thing really standing in the way of a re-ratification (or repeal) of anything is numbers. Get two-thirds of the State legislatures to call a convention and it's game on.
    “Now it is not good for the Christian’s health to hustle the Aryan brown,
    For the Christian riles, and the Aryan smiles and he weareth the Christian down;
    And the end of the fight is a tombstone white with the name of the late deceased,
    And the epitaph drear: “A Fool lies here who tried to hustle the East.”

  5. #5
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: Re-ratification

    Do you really think it makes a difference? Would the commiecrats act any better?
    Only a fool measures equality by results and not opportunities.

  6. #6
    Mod Conspiracy Theorist
    rocket88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    A very blue state
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,186

    Re: Re-ratification

    Quote Originally Posted by JJB3333 View Post
    Please read before voting


    Alright then people so i was browsing through another thread a few minutes ago and they had kind of deteriorated the conversation into what the constitutional amendments actually mean and whether we should have them repealed. So i started doing some passive research and you know what i found, almost half of the constitution was never ratified by states of today's america because they had not been created yet.

    So my question is, should we call for a re-ratification of the constitutional amendments so that all amendments have been thoroughly reviewed, and accepted or denied by the current states of america?
    It's completely unnecessary. If an Amendment isn't working, it can be repealed with another (See Prohibition. 18th Amendment banned alcohol, 21st repealed the 18th)

    Usually it's the 17th that people lose their minds about, and if the idea to repeal it gets enough traction, there can be another amendment to repeal it.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jetboogieman View Post
    This issue has been plowed more times than Paris Hilton.
    Quote Originally Posted by Oborosen View Post
    Too bad we have to observe human rights.

  7. #7
    Educator
    MichaelJR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Suckachusetts
    Last Seen
    05-25-16 @ 09:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,089

    Re: Re-ratification

    No, ****ing, way.

  8. #8
    Sage
    Perotista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    17,950
    Blog Entries
    25

    Re: Re-ratification

    Quote Originally Posted by JJB3333 View Post
    Please read before voting


    Alright then people so i was browsing through another thread a few minutes ago and they had kind of deteriorated the conversation into what the constitutional amendments actually mean and whether we should have them repealed. So i started doing some passive research and you know what i found, almost half of the constitution was never ratified by states of today's america because they had not been created yet.

    So my question is, should we call for a re-ratification of the constitutional amendments so that all amendments have been thoroughly reviewed, and accepted or denied by the current states of america?
    No, part of becoming a new state is the adoption of the Constitution as it stood at the time statehood was approved.
    This Reform Party member thinks it is high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first and their political party further down the line. But for way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

  9. #9
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,266

    Re: Re-ratification

    Quote Originally Posted by Perotista View Post
    No, part of becoming a new state is the adoption of the Constitution as it stood at the time statehood was approved.
    Right. They knew what they were buying. It's not like the Constitution was a secret.

  10. #10
    Sage
    Perotista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    17,950
    Blog Entries
    25

    Re: Re-ratification

    Quote Originally Posted by humbolt View Post
    Right. They knew what they were buying. It's not like the Constitution was a secret.
    No, it was right out there for them to see and read. Its not like a lot of other stuff the government does.
    This Reform Party member thinks it is high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first and their political party further down the line. But for way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •