Last edited by Henrin; 12-29-13 at 01:46 AM.
This is a stupid idea and it won't help anything, but it's not like it's a violation of Libertarian political principles.
edit: Now, if you want an example of an assistance program that does violate your civil rights... I also live in public housing. And part of living in public housing is waiving your right to keep and bear arms-- I'm not allowed to keep a firearm in my apartment. Far as I know, a private landlord wouldn't be able to enforce a provision like that in their lease, but I can be evicted from my home and possibly face criminal charges for exercising one of my most basic Constitutional rights while receiving public assistance.
Last edited by Korimyr the Rat; 12-29-13 at 02:16 AM.
You don't want to starve?
Fine, we will give you enough nutritious food to live.
You want to eat doughnuts and chocolate...get a job.
You refuse to do both, then starve to death...your choice.
I imagine about a billion people (at least) in the world would love all the free food they need for them and their families.
'What kind of sick and twisted toy factory is this?'
'We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile, and nothing can grow there. Too much, the best of us is washed away.'
"Better to be dead and cool, than alive and uncool."
You also need to realistically look at ingredients. Even a gallon of milk has multiple ingredients. A bag of noodles has many ingredients.