i have to ask what factually makes it "intrusion" as a negative?
when government intrudes to prevent rape its not called an "intrusion" in a negative light
its just based on feelings and not facts
Government putting the rapist in jail and protecting rights and enforcing laws was great because i know the victim and the hell with that criminal
Government giving this shop owner a fine (he wasnt fined just saying) and and protecting rights and enforcing laws was bad and intrusive because i dont like that law and i want to discriminate and that owner isnt a criminal he is a hero
it makes me laugh how people can paint a picture and ignore facts. ANd im not claiming im not guilty of it, im sure in my life i have done the same just something interesting ive noticed on many topics lately.
Laws that curtail free speech such as not being able to yell Fire! in a crowd.
Laws that enable us to curtail the right to liberty when you commit a crime...again, this is to protect society.
I see anti-discrimination laws much the same. Not without their drawbacks, but definitely enhancing the rights of Americans that are deserving more than harming those that do not agree.
Its like the word cult, all religions are cults but again its one of those words that people assume with negativity or SOME of its definitions have negativity so some dont like that.
incorrect, and this is used to many times..........you are held accountable, for the the harm you may do death/ pain of injury, loss of revenue, .......but not your words.
but government has no authority to apply force to you when no crime has been committed, or health and safety in not involved.
when you discriminate [ non violate], you are engaging in an emotional action, government has no authority becuase of how i behave emotionally.......i can be an A-HOLE, its none of the governments business.
Anti-Democracy advocate, Mixed government is the only good government
THE second point to be examined is, whether the [constitutional ]convention were authorized to frame and propose this mixed Constitution.
however you are ignoring the HARM to individuals and society that discrimination does and that is what the laws are based on. This is the priority that the govt is placing on PEOPLE'S EQUAL rights over PROPERTY rights.
So then you disagree with the fight for civil rights that blacks and women fought that the govt supported with laws that advanced their acceptance and equality in our society?
You can. I dont. I believe that American that DESERVE equal rights shouldnt have to wait until all individuals in a society are willing to recognize it. The feds responsibility OVER the states is to protect the minorty from the majority.
Id really like to read more about the illegal discrimination part and all the references and factual support it has.
PA has a site where most rulings are posted eventually but i couldnt find one that interactive for Colorado.