On a sports forum a bunch of people are discussing this case with Jameis Winston possibly raping a girl. Apparently there is no evidence other than the fact that they had sex, and she states that it was rape. In many rape cases it comes down to a he said, she said type thing. He says it was consensual, she says it wasn't.
Now I am not asking about this case specifically, but rather just using it as an example, who do you tend to believe in these cases? The easy answer I saw is not enough evidence means not guilty. However, if a guy and girl are alone and he wants to go further than her, not a ton of evidence is going to exist.