aberrant85
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Messages
- 594
- Reaction score
- 209
- Location
- SF Bay Area
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Gingrich answers Mandela critics - POLITICO.com
It should be clear that those who posted racist and vitriolic messages in response to Gingrich's statements are his followers, the people that read Gingrich's statements. While Newt expressed surprised at how his kind words could provoke such bile, he nonetheless shied away from the indisputable conclusion that these were the same people that usually cling to his every word.
If you were Newt, who I remind you was a history professor, should you look on this as a teachable moment? Should you ask yourself why these of all people call themselves your fans? Should you ask what that says about you, your opinions, or at least your tone?
Is it good enough to dismiss such people as the handful of bigots that invariably show up to conservative rallies and poison the atmosphere? Or should he ponder whether he is, in fact, on the right side of history on issues important to his followers, much as he implied that Reagan and Thatcher were when it came to Apartheid?
Newt Gingrich on Sunday addressed the backlash over comments he made on Facebook praising former South African President Nelson Mandela.
Gingrich said he was "very surprised" by reactions. And in response to the uproar, he wrote his Friday newsletter asking his followers what they would have done about Mandela's views and apartheid in South Africa.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) faced similar backlash on comments he made lauding Mandela's life and career. When Crowley asked if the criticism of their comments comes from fellow conservatives, Gingrich said they are people who "bought a rationale that defined everybody who was in anyway in rebellion against the established system in the third world as anti-American."
It should be clear that those who posted racist and vitriolic messages in response to Gingrich's statements are his followers, the people that read Gingrich's statements. While Newt expressed surprised at how his kind words could provoke such bile, he nonetheless shied away from the indisputable conclusion that these were the same people that usually cling to his every word.
If you were Newt, who I remind you was a history professor, should you look on this as a teachable moment? Should you ask yourself why these of all people call themselves your fans? Should you ask what that says about you, your opinions, or at least your tone?
Is it good enough to dismiss such people as the handful of bigots that invariably show up to conservative rallies and poison the atmosphere? Or should he ponder whether he is, in fact, on the right side of history on issues important to his followers, much as he implied that Reagan and Thatcher were when it came to Apartheid?