There's another thread, which begins with the suggestion that the pervert-rights movement, on getting homosexuality “normalized”, will logically proceed to try to similarly promote the acceptance and normalization of other perversions, including pedophilia. It seems to me that there's a fairly clear overlap between the pervert-rights advocates in that other thread who swear up and down that they'll stop with homosexuality, and those in this thread who defend Mr. Polanski and his protectors. And what they defend here, regarding Mr, Polanski's behavior, is a few steps beyond what, in the other thread, they swear they will never support.
It also ties in with the defenders of abortion, who like to equate the innocent child who is targeted by this savage practice to a rapist.
No, I'm not buying that.
I just think any lib defending Roman Polansky is being cheap and shallow. They're thinking about left vs right more than they are thinking about the victim and the crime. Nobody can think it's OK for a 43 year old man to drug and rape a 13 year old girl.
These libs are seeking out some reason to marginalize or ignore the rape of a child because they're so dug in to their side on this left vs right debate, they can't see the forest for the trees anymore.
Which is why I love love love this issue. It will jar some of them loose.
Every dem, lefty, etc KNOWS it's wrong to rape a 13 year old child. Every single one. They have to, or they aren't even fit to call human.
Now they can choose to ignore it, but somewhere in the back of their minds, they will always know that the big money that buys elections for the Democratic Party, namely the Hollywood producers, are the same asshats that support Roman Polanski and his getting away with rape.
This is the party of women's rights (unless it's a young girl a powerful Hollywood director covets, then she's fair game for rape) and the party of sympathy (unless it's a 13 year old little girl raped by a powerful artist).
You know it has to make at least the decent ones stop and think.
No matter what pet issues they believe in, no matter how right they think they are, they will, in the back of their minds, always know that the money that backed so many of their elections is the same blood money that allowed the rapist of a 13 year old child to walk free. And that money continues to support him to this day.
The 1 percent.... oh the irony.
And that's something a normal, average, decent person, even a left-leaning person, needs to sit back and question.
Is that really the party I want to support? Am I really OK with a hollywood elite raping a child and escaping under cover of night and with the support of the whole hollywood community?
I mean, people have to look at that and ask questions.